It seems the sinfulness of babies is
once again afoot, but studies have shown that most babies are born with a sense
of morality and they prefer the good guys. I believe this heavily affects what
we should consider sin and where to draw the line for good morals. At least
until the cultural climate changes, that is.
Paul Bloom led a study showing babies
puppet shows; each show involved a character in need, a helpful character, and
a selfish or spiteful character (for more info, check out this link: http://bit.ly/2d37Skb). After watching the
plot unfold multiple times, the babies were given an opportunity to select a
character, and a large majority of the babies picked the helpful character (and
punished the selfish one, in one version). What does this mean for us, and where
do these morals come from?
I think most humans are born knowing
right from wrong, but from the moment they gain awareness the environment
begins to mold who they are and who they will become. A child is the closest we
can come to observing a blank human slate, so each study is vital to
determining who we were before we developed a society with which we evolve
ourselves every day. Our definitions of right and wrong, good and bad, pure and
vile, all stem from our base instincts. Over time we needed ways to express
these gut feelings of happiness and pleasure; therefore, we also labeled what
causes them as well as their inverse counterparts.
I believe the nice feeling inside became
goodness, and due to the vast majority of us favoring goodness, it became what
was expected from our fellow peoples. Deviants are outliers and many outliers
felt the nice feelings from what the majority labeled as badness. Are they
wrong for feeling this way? No, they are just different. Their morals do not
line up with the majority, and as some deviances subtly worked into our society
we grew to accept them and expand what we defined to be goodness.
Because of these tiny differences caused
by developing amidst an environment of subtly less goodness, growing up now
causes us to loosen up our morals. What if the bad puppet had a good reason for
doing his apparently bad action? We are now open to badness, whereas that baby knows, regardless of
circumstance, that the action in and of itself is either good or bad.
(H1) this is interesting when posing babies' natural goodness against the idea of original sin and how they must be born inherently needing redemption.
ReplyDelete