Up@dawn 2.0

Friday, April 17, 2020

Quiz Apr 23

Wittgenstein, Arendt, Popper & Kuhn, Foot & Thomson LH 34-37; FL 40-41; AP -149.
Exam and Final Report info here...  [audio files removed, request links if you wish]

1. What was the main message of Wittgenstein's Tractatus?

2. What did the later Wittgenstein (of Philosophical Investigations) mean by "language games," what did he think was the way to solve philosophical problems, and what kind of language did he think we can't have?

3. Who was Adolf Eichmann, and what did Arendt learn about him at his trial?

4. What was Arendt's descriptive phrase for what she saw as Eichmann's ordinariness?

5. Both Popper and Kuhn changed the way people understood science. What did Popper say about the method for checking a hypothesis and what name did Kuhn give to major breaks in the history of science? 

6. What is the Law of Double Effect? Many people who disagree with its principle--and with Thomson's violinist thought experiment--think that whatever our intentions we shouldn't play who?

FL
7. Paul Ryan grew up reading whose fictions?

8. What do Pennsylvania and Tennessee formally require officeholders to believe?

9. When did an inaccurate study ignite the false belief that vaccines cause autism?

AP
10. What great American poet agreed with James, Royce, and Santayana about the deeper meaning of  ordinary experience?

11. How did Camus define "the absurd"? 

12. What did James say would be his first act of free will?

DQ
  • Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
  • Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
  • Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
  • If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond
  • Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?
  • [DQs on Popper & Kuhn, Foot & Thomson, FL, AP]



thinkPhilosophy (@tPhilosophia)
"What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence" - Wittgenstein's *Tractatus*: ow.ly/ClvRr #phil


thinkPhilosophy (@tPhilosophia)
Wittgenstein on problems translating language, computer science, and artificial intelligence. slate.com/articles/life/…



Ray Monk (@Raymodraco)
The video of my Turing/Wittgenstein lecture has now been posted & can be found here: britishwittgensteinsociety.org/event/eighteen…

Philosophy Matters (@PhilosophyMttrs)
Thomas Kuhn Wasn't So Bad ... buff.ly/2IpZf10

  • April 26 is the birthday of the man who said, “Philosophy is like trying to open a safe with a combination lock: each little adjustment of the dials seems to achieve nothing, only when everything is in place does the door open”: Ludwig Wittgenstein (books by this author), born in Vienna in 1889. He was described by his colleague Bertrand Russell as “the most perfect example I have known of genius as traditionally conceived: passionate, profound, intense, and dominating.” He was the youngest of nine children; three of his brothers committed suicide. 


Wittgenstein was born into one of the richest families in Austro-Hungary, but he later gave away his inheritance to his siblings, and also to an assortment of Austrian writers and artists, including Rainer Maria Rilke. He once said that the study of philosophy rescued him from nine years of loneliness and wanting to die, yet he tried to leave philosophy several times and pursue another line of work, including serving in the army during World War I, working as a porter at a London hospital, and teaching elementary school. He also considered careers in psychiatry and architecture — going so far as to design and build a house for his sister, which she never liked very much 
Wittgenstein was particularly interested in language. He wrote: “The limits of my language are the limits of my mind. All I know is what I have words for.” And, “Uttering a word is like striking a note on the keyboard of the imagination.” -Writer's Almanac



  • “The world is everything that is the case.” 
  • “Death is not an event in life: we do not live to experience death. If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present. Our life has no end in the way in which our visual field has no limits.”
  • “I give no sources, because it is indifferent to me whether what I have thought has already been thought before me by another.”
  • “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.”
  • “A nothing will serve just as well as a something about which nothing could be said.”
  • “A logical picture of facts is a thought.”
  • “A picture held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably.”



  • What do we see when we observe the above figure? What we see in the above figure, of course, is dependent upon that with which we are familiar. Those who are not acquainted with the shape and form of a rabbit but are with that of a duck will see only a duck--and vice versa... When we normally speak of seeing in our everyday language-game, we are not inclined to say, "I see the picture as a duck," but rather we simply say, "I see a duck."
  • “Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language.”
  • “If you tried to doubt everything you would not get as far as doubting anything. The game of doubting itself presupposes certainty.”
  • “Death is not an event in life: we do not live to experience death. If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present. Our life has no end in the way in which our visual field has no limits.” 
  • “I give no sources, because it is indifferent to me whether what I have thought has already been thought before me by another.” 
  • “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.”
  • “A nothing will serve just as well as a something about which nothing could be said.”
==



  • “The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil.”
  • “The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.”
  • “The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal. From the viewpoint of our legal institutions and of our moral standards of judgment, this normality was much more terrifying than all the atrocities put together.”
  • It was as though in those last minutes he was summing up the lesson that this long course in human wickedness had taught us-the lesson of the fearsome word-and-thought-defying banality of evil.” 

New Republic (@NewRepublic)
Hannah Arendt's writings warn us that danger comes when people no longer care if something is true or not. bit.ly/2pieugo pic.twitter.com/j8Io2VanwA



156 comments:

  1. Marie Hussels H0112:03 AM CST

    "Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?"
    We should always speak for what is important to us even if it cannot be proven. Philosophy should concern itself with understanding everything there is to possibly understand. If something cannot be proven we can learn more about other things.
    "Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?"
    I use language to express what I think and feel. I use it to say what I feel about others and to improve my social relationships. Language is my way to express what I think and feel to the world.
    "Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?"
    Ordinary people are definitely capable of great evil. The Holocaust was caused by ordinary people and even today we see acts that seem unspeakable. I will teach my children to think for themselves and be individuals.
    "If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?"
    I like to think that I would try and stand up for the people being unfairly treated but at the end of the day I truly don't know what I would do. Sometimes it is hard to imagine what I would do because I know as a single person it would be nearly impossible to do it all alone.
    "Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?"
    The "banality of evil" is definitely relevant to our time. We look around and see a lot of hatred these days towards people. It is especially disturbing because this is a very developed country. It always seems like hatred could never travel to a place like this yet we see it every day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Section 9

      I think the propagation of untruths is the "banality of evil" in our time. It can start small: a baseless opinion rooted in prejudice. With the power of the internet, these ideas spread easily and are readily available.

      Delete
    2. I understand that it would be hard to do alone with protesting the rounding up of certain ethnic races. I agree with that as well, but I'm sure if many of us are willing to stand up for it, then our combined voices will force someone to do something.

      Delete
    3. I have never thought about the way I use language but I agree with you I think I just use it to communicate what I think and feel. I'm not sure it goes much deeper than that.

      Delete
    4. For me the use of language is not only used in communicating with others, but also how I perceive the world around me and within me. It becomes a means of reframing my perception of things. Keep in mind that how we define something is very important in our perceptions, and that is directly influenced by language. #11

      Delete
  2. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?

    There are some who believe that the purist knowledge attainable through a human mind cannot be put into words. For this reason, art is a significant medium through which we can understand something about one another otherwise unknowable. I guess what I'm getting at is that philosophers should become artists. H2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kevin Hernandez Ovalle HO2
      Interesting claim Shawn, but I see from where your coming from. I agree that there are just some things tht can’t be explained through words. Art, just like you stated, can be one way. Actions can be too.

      Delete
    2. Section 9

      The use of art seems to be substituting one form of symbols for another. I think both art and language can be equally effective at "proving" things as best as we can.

      Delete
    3. That's a good point. We all say that music is an universal language, so if we are able to channel that artistic part in all of us, I am sure we can discuss without the significant usage of wordy language.

      Delete
    4. I guess it depends what your proof is and what it means to have people believe you. We really only habe one for 100% sure truth and that is that we will die. We have proof from everyone ever dying, no exceptions. But some people use science to prove things and that is enough for them. Others use religion or spirits. I think we should all be able to voice our opnions even if you belive some of them aren't valid or "proven." How will we find the truth if we don't explore it?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous12:21 PM CDT

      Joslyn Parker Phil 1030-009

      I think Philosophers are already artists. Novels, poetry, speeches, etc. The arrangement of words is a form of art. And just like the arrangement of color in a painting, or notes in a song, some arrangements appeal more to some than others.

      Delete
  3. Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    We all do at a fundamental level. Those of us who talk anyway. With that being said, the art of conversation has taken an almost fatal, constant bombardment of ignorance and stupidity that few are able to get through five minutes of 'convo' with someone who is brainwashed by media as many are today. This is coming from someone who spends most of his time reading and thinking as opposed to searching for someone to pass time with by meaningless nothings. H2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree with what you are saying. However, sometimes, we need to listen to the ignorance that surrounds us everyday. We need to be able to listen and see where the root of the problem lies. Perhaps we can change someone else's ideology enough to allow them to see a different perspective.

      Delete
    2. I get what you are saying that sometimes people just talk out hier wazoo and don't even comprehend what they are saying. But on the other hand some people enjoy "the media" as you put it. People enjoy keeping up with celebrities and talking about the gossip and things going on. I don't think that just because you enjoy reading you should assume people are stupid if they don't read or if they follow celebrities on social media. Yes people can talk to much, but we need those people to talk and put news ideas out into the world. People enjoy differeent things and some like to talk that doesn't mean they are less than it just means yiu should find some different people to talk to :)

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Definitely agree with you guys! We should try to listen to understand others and their viewpoints.

      Delete
  4. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    Ordinary people are not capable of great evil. It takes a certain degree of genius, even brilliance, to accomplish such a feat. Hitler was able to influence a mass of people with his ideas and opinions. At the risk of sounding arrogant, I believe I am, or could be, capable of great evil. I've read enough books to understand all a good majority of the little things one must do to gain a following of a mass of people. What will I teach my kids about the Holocaust? I don't know, that it was wrong? H2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kevin Hernandez Ovalle HO2
      I understand your point, but is killing toher people the only way of committing great evil. There are thousands of ways to do evil to other people.

      Delete
    2. Section 9

      I think perpetrators of great evil - Stalin, Mao, Hitler - if not genius, have either tons of charisma, or serious political chops to bend most of a nation to their will. Ordinary people can surely do their share of harm, but they usually don't wield enough power to commit mass murder (unless you consider terrorists 'ordinary').

      Delete
    3. I do think that you need to possess a certain intellect and charisma to lead people to mass destruction, but I also believe that the circumstances have to be right for people to want to follow an evil person. For example, Germany was going through one of the worst economic depression when Hitler started to gain power.

      Delete
    4. I do think we are all capable of great evil some more than others and you are correct to lead people to mass destruction you do probably need some kind of power most of the time. Esspecially something as large scale as the holocaust, but what about the shooting in Las Vegas, or the school shooting in Florida. I am NOT saying these are worst than the Holocaust at all! But these are also great acts of evil. Killing other people for no reason or motive. Just killing to kill. Also the taliban and Isis and many others are out there killing people for what they belive and bombing villages. That is evil. They are harrassing people and selling women and boys. That is evil. Slavery that was evil what those people went through. I think ordinary people can commit great evil even if they don't kill 6 million people.

      Delete
    5. 9
      I think ordinary people are capable of great evil. Like in the reading, there are some ordinary people who just do not think. They do not think about the consequences of what they are doing. Also, what one considers evil, another might not.

      Delete
    6. I am on the fence of whether I agree with this or not, but I think you make a very valid point. Historically, it seems that all of the greatest evil dictators were "smart" enough to have mass followings. I do agree that it takes a certain kind of education to do so. However, I think about the people who commit random crimes of passion, or money-influenced murders. I think it just depends on the degree of evil we are talking about.

      However, I'd like to know what qualifies you as being not ordinary?

      Delete
    7. In a way, I think so. Mostly under the power of circumstance like the worker bees of the holocaust. The evil they performed, in large part due to the pressures of the situation and cultural normalization inside the Nazi army, affected large numbers of people in horrific ways. There were those who fought the situation, like the chief of intelligence Wilhelm Canaris of nazi germany at the time, and plenty of others in smaller undocumented ways. The choice to never fight brings at least some part of the great evils you perform to be your fault, even under threat.

      Nazi's are a bit of a logical extreme, I'll admit, but nothing else quickly springs to mind. It's a rare occurrence, and I see the argument that other higher leaders are the root cause, but I think some blame and great evil can be performed by certain high-throughput but low-level workers

      Delete
  5. If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?

    I would be even more thankful of my current ethnicity. I'm not the type to go out and protest. I'm sure I would know many people who would. If asked, I would not join someone in a march or any other form of open protest. I wouldn't lead a movement of disgruntled minorities. Now if an insurrection where to spring up because of this, I just might pick up arms. For personal ideologies, mind you. H2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Section 9

      I think many people would (justifiably) be driven to violence. How I would respond would be complete speculation - I simply don't know. But it wouldn't feel moral.

      Delete
    2. I understand where you're coming from. Violence may always follow those type of riots however. I do agree that I am the type to just stay behind in protesting events, but should the situation arise, I will have to pick up arms to protect my family and myself.

      Delete
    3. I am not the type to protest or march but this would be one of the few cases where I would. We can't just do that to people who aren't doing anything to anyone and have lived here thier whole lives. Being a bystander is just as bad in this situation.

      Delete
    4. Michael DeLay4:34 PM CDT

      I agree with the comments here. I think the world would be driven into chaos. If they are being deported for no reason and is not justifiable, then government should take responsibility and something needs to change. Impeachment, etc.
      Sec 5

      Delete
  6. Kevin Hernandez Ovalle HO2
    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    Define ordinary? When I think of ordinary I think of each and single one of us. We are all alike in some sense, but when you think about it even a young child like Eric Smith (who killed a another boy because he was bullied based upon his appearance) is capable of doing great evil. In other words I d think that ordinary people can commit great and evil acts. It doesn’t have to be physically killing someone; it can range from emotionally, socially, or mentallly destroying someone with bad intentions that I think can also classify someone as evil.
    The only way to insure another Holocaust doesn’t occur again is to stop fighting (war) and for countries to unite and form friendly alliance. I know this sounds unrealistic, but if this was to happen crime organizations, hate groups, and terrotists could be stopped with the cooperation of various nations. The enemy would be to small and weak to battle against a strong nation(s). Thus fighting among nations would stop and peace could be established. If only it was easier said then done then the world would be a better place.
    When the day comes for me to teach my children about the Holocaust it will be a dark day. AlthoughI have no family ties (that I know of) to the Holocaust I am strongly against the bloodshed of millions of people based upon their ethnicity and false justifications. I will use it as an example to show them that violence and hatred never ends good, and that someone always ends up hurt. Hopefully this will motivate them to be better people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your assessment of ordinary. We need to be able to accurately definite what ordinary is in order for us to see the damage that "ordinary" people could do in their daily lives. However, we also need to teach our children what would happen if we happen to turn that "ordinary" part of our lives to something "non-ordinary."

      Delete
    2. I also believe "great evil" should be more specifically defined. I've noticed most people were only thinking of murder as great evil. Although, many people suffer at the hands of mental and emotional abusers. These scars are long lasting and can be considered great evil to the victims. This type of evil doesn't require someone to not be ordinary.
      Section 6

      Delete
  7. Kevin Hernandez Ovalle HO2
    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?
    I would speak out against this injustice. Not for only Latinos, but also Muslims were are stained with the stereotype that all of us are either rapist, stealers, drug lords or sellers, terrorists, or here illegal. Many of us don’t fall into any of those categories, but instead decide to give a blind eye of the injustice of what’s occurring in American in order to make it great again. I would proposal other methods that don’t involve sending people back to their homelands. Most left or fled escaping poverty and danger. It wouldn’t be helping anyone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you, we definitely are stained with that stereotype, even though most of us want only want a better future. I believe that every race has bad people, and it is unfair that people assume the worst of us.

      Delete
  8. Section 9

    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    I use language primarily to persuade. Everyone feels righteous (right) - it's a product of post-hoc attempts to justify our actions and behavior. When we feel strongly about something, language through words or writing are the only methods to convince others to agree with us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I use language to persuade as well, but I think I differ in the way that I primarily use language to simply explain how I feel about a certain situation. Although I try to persuade the other side to understand my circumstances, I just want to tell my circumstance and have sympathy for my situation. In the same way, I want to be able to sympathize with other people's situation.

      Delete
  9. Section 9

    Alternate DQ

    Do you agree that people that can't remember their crimes are innocent?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think it's that they can't remember, but it's more that they believe what they are doing is right. With that, I believe that that's more dangerous than having an individual know what they are doing is wrong. If people genuinely believe that what they are doing is right without questioning it, there is nothing in the world that can change their ideology.

      Delete
    2. I don't always follow this belief because it is a real psychological thing that if you have been through drama then your brain can sometimes wipe that memory or other memories. If the crime was tragic to them to commit they might not be able to remember it even if they did it.

      Delete
    3. It depends. Was the crime caused by something they do remember? If the person has violent tendencies, and doesn't remember/got temp mind wiped assaulting someone but there is proof, the person should still be punished because the real fault is the very angry person that is still inside of them.

      However, if someone is slipped some drugs and runs around naked and unconscious (?) they should probably get a pass, as long as it's the first time.

      Delete
    4. Michael DeLay4:37 PM CDT

      Are you saying, someone committed a crime, but can't remember it, does that make them innocent? Definitely not. Just because someone can't remember their crime does not erase the fact that they committed the crime in the first place.
      Sec 5

      Delete
  10. Section 9

    Speaking of 'banality of evil,' who is more valuable to humanity? Mother Theresa or Adolph Hitler? David Burns, philosophy student, psychiatrist (major contributor to CBT) and author responds.

    https://feelinggood.com/tag/human-worthwhileness/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This article is very interesting. Really enjoyed reading it. It makes so many points clear.

      Delete
  11. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    I believe that we should be silent in things we cannot accurately know. For example, we should not be gossiping about issues that we do not know both sides of. Sometimes, the best way to handle a situation is through silence. Too much words can be cluttering, and we can't think properly.

    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    I use language as a tool to express my thoughts and feelings. I also try to use it as a pictorial medium, especially if I am trying to explain a situation that I was in. I do my best to use language to the best of my knowledge.

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    People are capable of great evil. I'm not sure I am capable of great evil, but they do say that all villains are the heroes of their own stories. To prevent another Holocaust, we would need to continue telling our children the horrifying experience of the whole dark period and make sure they understand what would happen if another Holocaust happened.

    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond
    I would respond negatively. I would passively stew in my anger, but I would make sure that my voice is heard whether it be through social media or through my friends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some DQ's:
      1. What do you think of the phrase: villains are all heroes of their own stories?
      2. Do you think that emotions will forever be hard to put into language?
      3. What would your response be to the train problem? What does that say about you as a person?
      4. How do you feel about TN's requirement?

      Delete
    2. ahh the train problem I love thinking about it! In the instance that everyone was equal and you knew no one with five on the right and one on the left I would pull the lever every time. The only time i would hesistate to pull or not pull the lever is if it was a dearly loved one on the one side and five starangers on the other. That would be really hard.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:52 AM CDT

      Joslyn Parker Phil 1030-009

      My response to the trail question, I wouldn't pull the lever. I would do what I could to warn those on the track. Try shouting or making a lot of noise. I figure if I have time to pull a lever then I'd have time to shout.

      Delete
    4. I like your question, El Jo, regarding emotions. Emotions are something that isn't tangible. I feel that it seems to be very hard to put anything into language that you cant see, touch, or feel. I would be curious to see the mechanisms created to make them easier to explain. Should we create words that allow them to be more vivid as a solution? How could you standardize emotions to make them easier for everyone to understand considering everyone may feel the same thing differently?
      Section 6

      Delete
  12. DQs
    -Is history bound to repeat itself?
    - Are people born with natural good in them trying to reach human perfection?
    - What defines good?
    - Where do our morals come from and why do we have them while animals do not really have them? When an animal kills another animal it isn't murder but rather the circle of life.
    - If someone recicves the death penelty is that just repaying evil with evil? Does it solve anything?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1030-10
      -Is history bound to repeat itself?
      If we learn from it, theoretically no, it is not bound to learn from itself.
      - Are people born with natural good in them trying to reach human perfection?
      I think it has to do with both nature and nurture.
      - What defines good?
      I think its more of what you feel is the right thing to do.
      - Where do our morals come from and why do we have them while animals do not really have them? When an animal kills another animal it isn't murder but rather the circle of life.
      We are more evolved species than animals, our only source of food is not humans, but for animals they can't cook that's why they need to feed on other animals to survive.
      - If someone recicves the death penelty is that just repaying evil with evil? Does it solve anything?
      I think it is repaying evil with evil since death penalty has been going on for years but the number of murders or rapes hasn't reduced.

      Delete
    2. Michael DeLay4:40 PM CDT

      I think history does repeat itself. People seem to not like change and when that happens they don't do things differently. So they do the same thing to try and solve the solution that did not work out in the past. I think it's hard to believe that we have not made the same mistakes as the previous generations at some point in our lives.
      Sec 5

      Delete
  13. Section 6
    Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?

    I think people should be silent on topics if they are going to speak about them as if they know about them 100%. Being silent on matters you don't fully know about could be a missed learning opportunity.

    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    All of the above! Language is everywhere whether it's verbal or not. I can see how it's impossible to have a private language because it is so central to how we express ourselves and ideas. That doesn't have to be a bad thing, though!!

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    I think people do have the capabilities to do evil things. Especially if their behaviors and thoughts are reinforced by their peers or family. I guess the only way we can make sure the Holocaust doesn't happen again is if people watch out for signs of mass genocide. We are taught about the Holocaust extensively. The information is out there. It's up to us whether or not we read it and think about it.

    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?

    I can only imagine that I would be disgusted. I'm disgusted by the immigration talk that's filling our country currently. Let people be people on this planet that we all share.

    Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?

    Extremely. In our society, maybe not "evil," but the amount of people who follow rules or support certain people because of what they were taught or told is rampant, at least in the south.

    ReplyDelete
  14. PHIL 1030-010
    Alternate Quiz Questions:
    1. 'Bewitchment by _____.' was a central theme in Wittgenstein's later work.
    2. Popper said that science doesn't rely on ______.
    3. What were the right's two wildest dreams during the 90s?
    4. What was said in an internal memo within the Brown & Williamson cigarette company?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous11:46 AM CDT

    Joslyn Parker Phil 1030-009

    Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?

    Yes, I think so now more than ever before. With the accessibility of worldwide media, its very easy to become numb to it all. Kids now have access to news coverage daily on whatever devices and social media outlets they're using. They are growing up seeing awful things happen around the world everyday, and I think that will normalize suffering for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To add on to the kids thing, they are also playing video games where they kill people (some can be quite graphic) and violence and things like that are just being seen by them everyday. I do not think this can be a good thing in any way.

      Delete
    2. Social media is a perfect example of how "the banality of evil" is relevant in our time. It allows for someone to have a large platform. Along with that large platform comes many people who are able to see it and choose to participate. I also agree about the point you made regarding desensitization. Anytime anyone sees something many times, it starts to become more and more normalized. It can be dangerous depending on what that thing is.
      Section 6

      Delete
  16. PHIL 1030-010
    "Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?"

    I believe that language is an important aspect of our culture and of who we are - for me, personally, it embodies a lot of how I express myself, because I do so through writing constantly and establishing my thoughts and feelings on pen and paper (or, computer and keyboard, as it has come to be known).

    So much of my fascination with writing and language comes simply from how complex and sometimes puzzling it can be in its many forms - much of what I find interesting, reading-wise, I find enjoyment in because of how the writer chooses their words and how they structure them accordingly. Writers can all have various styles or ways of writing that give them subtle differences when compared to fellow writers, but in the end, the sentences can mean virtually the same thing - the subtle variations that writers can apply to their writings to make all of these words and text have a different meaning or wording, some of which are prettier or more well-rounded, make all the difference in how language and writing are important to me for conveying feelings and views of the world we live in.

    Writing plays such an important role in my life, as does language, respectively - its a vital part of how I live and the hobbies that I entertain, and it also helps me to connect with the people I care about and write honestly about how I feel. Language, itself, helps me connect with individuals by giving me a way to describe feelings, emotions, places, people, and things, and that in itself allows me to connect with the world around me in a feasible manner.

    ReplyDelete
  17. DQ: Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    We shouldn't necessarily be silent about what we can't prove, but rather, like Popper would say, we should be silent about what we can't prove wrong. Philosophy concerning itself with the logic of language is very similar to concerning itself with understanding as most if not all of our thinking is language-oriented.

    DQ: Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    I use language mostly as a tool for social communication and artistic expression.

    DQ: Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?
    We cannot in any way be sure that something that bad would not happen again. Much like Arendt's view of some Nazis, people can do evil things, maybe without even being evil themselves. We should always be on guard against that and look at our actions and how they affect others, even if our intentions are not harmful. I would teach my children about the holocaust and I would protest and work against anything like that happening in America.

    DQ: Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?
    Yes absolutely. This is most relevant in modern day racism, homophobia, and transphobia. I know many people who are kind and loving to people they encounter on a daily basis, but support harmful and racist politics or are essentially evil in the way that they treat queer individuals once outed to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I combined two answers and questions here, so this should be five DQs rather than four, but all were answered and responded to.

      Delete
  18. Alternative quiz questions:
    1) What is one reason, according to Andersen, that the left remained "more or less in charge of their followers, while the reality based right lost control to its fantasy prone believers?"
    A: Religion, conspiracy theories

    2) Who argued in the 1960s that "the right is inherently more fertile ground for [conspiracy based] paranoia?"
    A: Richard Hofstadter

    3) What percentage of people who voted Republican in 2012 believe "a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world with an authoritarian world government?"
    A: 34 percent

    4) What conspiracy theory did Newt Gingrich mention during a 2012 primary debate that garnered applause from the audience?
    A: Agenda 21

    5) "As a teenager in the 1950s," who had Pat Buchanan's "hero" been?
    A: Joe McCarthy

    6) What political view does Andersen call "an ideology most boys grow out of?"
    A: Libertarianism

    7) According to Andersen "reasonable Republicanism what replaced by" what?
    A: Absolutism

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous12:13 PM CDT

    Joslyn Parker Phil 1030-009

    "Here are the seven essential conclusions of Karl Popper, which are useful to any thinker, to determine the difference between science and pseudoscience."

    https://fs.blog/2016/01/karl-popper-on-science-pseudoscience/

    ReplyDelete
  20. 9
    "Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?"
    I use language mainly as a tool for expressing my thoughts and feelings, as well as managing social relationships. I think human socializing is important. Talking and laughing with friends always can put me in a better mood. I also think it's important to tell people how much they mean to you, and to just simply tell them you love them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! At a time like this, where social interaction is limited, I'm glad people can resort to language in the form of texting to talk!

      Delete
    2. I agreed with your explanation, language should be a tool for managing social relations and expressing our thoughts and feelings. There's an old saying, "life is too short", i believe that, we need to express and use language to engage with others within a short amount of time that we had.

      Delete
  21. Alternative quiz questions:
    8) What fraction of Donald Trump's primary voters still believe Barack Obama is a Muslim?
    A: Two-thirds of voters

    9) What term did Pete Wagner coin to refer to the movement to make America a theocracy?
    A: "the Third Wave" or "dominionism"

    10) Who said, "The University of Google is where I got my degree from?"
    A: Jenny McCarthy

    11) What are two conspiracy theories that more left wing thinkers seem to believe in?
    A: GMOs are harmful, and that vaccines cause autism (so therefore do not vaccinate your children)

    12) Who did Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. claim were "involved in a massive fraud?"
    A: U.S. Government scientists studying vaccination

    13) What "starts to collapse and permit infectious epidemics when as few as six percent [of people] forgo immunization?"
    A: Herd immunity

    14) As mentioned by Andersen, what was the surprising percentage of parents who did not vaccinate their children in many New York private schools?
    A: Thirty percent

    ReplyDelete
  22. 1030-10
    Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    Yes it should because semantics play a important role in debates.
    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    I do like to paint a picture sometimes while I am talking about a passionate subject.
    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    Every one has a side of good and evil in them, the environment, the nurture and our choices are what make us who we are.
    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?
    I think that it is a really improper thing to do.
    Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?
    Yes it is very much still relevant to our time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think we should be silent about things that we cant prove. However, I think that we should be willing to listen if it becomes proven in the future or someone offers logical facts about it.

      Delete
  23. 1030-10
    Posting for Jesse Pohl
    1) Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    Just because you can’t prove it doesn’t mean you can’t get close to a conclusion or open a conversation. No philosophy and language are very different.

    2) Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    Yes, I believe language can be used for a lot of different things. I believe language is very powerful and looking at the real meaning and not just getting caught up in the words.

    3) Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    I believe they are. We all have free will, we can all make our own decisions. We are made for good but choose evil sometimes. I think I am capable technically, but I would choose good. We are who we are and our morals and what makes us who we are plays a big role in this. The holocaust will never happen again exactly because Hitler is not alive, and no one can perfectly replicate something. I will teach them about what happened and that it was sad and wrong.

    4) If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond
    That would be sad. I would pray that whatever needed to happen would happen.

    5) Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?
    Yes.


    Alt. Quiz Questions

    1) Who said: “Philosophy is like trying to open a safe with a combination lock: each little adjustment of the dials seems to achieve nothing, only when everything is in place does the door open”?
    2) Who did the person from the question above give their inheritance to?
    3) Who is Rainer Maria Rilke?
    4) Who said: “Under conditions of tyranny it is far easier to act than to think”?
    5) Who is the person from the question above?
    6) What are three of the many books that Ludwig Wittgenstein wrote?
    7) Who is Alistair Watson?
    8) How many years difference is there in Wittgenstein’s age and Alan Turing’s age?
    9) What is Russell’s Paradox?
    10) Who saw no place and saw no functions, no ‘leading problems’?
    11) What is Bertrand Russell’s relationship to Wittgenstein?
    12) Was Wittgenstein born to a poor or a rich family?
    13) Where was he born?
    14) What do Hannah Arendt’s writings warn us of?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1) Who said: “Philosophy is like trying to open a safe with a combination lock: each little adjustment of the dials seems to achieve nothing, only when everything is in place does the door open”?
      Wittgenstein.
      2) Who did the person from the question above give their inheritance to?
      Siblings and Rainer Maria.
      3) Who is Rainer Maria Rilke?
      Austrian artist
      4) Who said: “Under conditions of tyranny it is far easier to act than to think”?
      Hannah Arendt
      5) Who is the person from the question above?
      She was an American philosopher and political theorist.
      6) What are three of the many books that Ludwig Wittgenstein wrote?
      Philosophical investigations, major works, on certainty.
      8) How many years difference is there in Wittgenstein’s age and Alan Turing’s age?
      23
      9) What is Russell’s Paradox?
      In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox, discovered by Bertrand Russell in 1901, showed that some attempted formalizations of the naïve set theory created by Georg Cantor led to a contradiction.
      10) Who saw no place and saw no functions, no ‘leading problems’?
      Wittgenstein

      Delete
    2. If the government tried to detain certain people that would be horrible. Definitely agree with. This would probably concern many people around the world as well.

      Delete
    3. 1030-10
      Apr 11
      What is Bertrand Russell’s relationship to Wittgenstein?
      Russel was Wittgenstein’s mentor

      Delete
  24. Lesley Walker - Section 10

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    I think all people are capable of evil. I don’t think that people are naturally good or bad by nature, but a combination of the 2 that are shaped and determined by life experiences and those people who have an impact in our lives. Different situations and people will bring out different levels of good and bad and depending on those experiences we can become more of one and less of another. I think people feed off those experiences and what the feel they get out of it determines how the view being good or evil. I don’t think there is anyway to truly prevent another Holocaust from happening due to how much evil there is in the world and the idea that history repeats itself. English settlers took land and killed mass amounts of Native Americans when they first came to the U.S., which I view to be the same type of mass killing of a certain type of people as the Holocaust was with Jewish people. To this day people are still killed because of race and religion, just not always in the same masses as the Holocaust, but shouldn’t be viewed as any less evil. Children should be educated not only about the Holocaust and the impact it has had on history, but also about how we continue to still see the same kind of evil in this world. I think the more we know about the evil in the world, the more we learn about how to deal with it and to try and prevent or fix the damage that it causes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed! I feel the same way about it! I think it's one of the easiest ones to answer.

      Delete
  25. 010
    DQ:
    Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    I think we should be silent about things we are ignorant about, but not necessarily things we cant prove, and yes I think you can apply philosophy to everything.
    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    Mainly a pictorial medium.
    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    I think ordinary people and myself are not, but there is no true protective barrier to prevent another holocaust. Hopefully I will teach my children about a great evil that wont be repeated in their lifetime.
    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond
    Protest.
    Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?
    Most certainly with our president.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 010
    Alternate Quiz Question: Would you be interested in reading "The Banality of Evil"?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Phil- 10
    I don't think we should be silent about things we can't prove, but to ask questions because some else might help you out. Philosophy should concern with understanding the balance of wisdom of everything logical and unwise.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Phil 10

    I mainly use language as a tool to manage social relationships and to express thoughts and feelings. I also use text messages, emails to ask questions and for thoughts. Also, music for feelings, but mostly to pass the time, unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:32 AM CDT

      I agree. I mainly use the understanding of body language. Although music is great way to understand but it is just a pass of time.
      Section 11

      Delete
  29. Phil 10

    Everyone is capable of great evil, depending on what influences or situations. I'm not sure if another Holocaust would happen, but I want to trust the people of sanity that it won't. my children would learn about it because it's an important lesson to not commit horrible and hateful actions to anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 5

      It depends on what type of scale you are talking about. In mainland China they round up in concentration camps and the rest of the world ignores it.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/a-spreadsheet-of-those-in-hell-how-china-corralled-uighurs-into-concentration-camps/2020/02/28/4daeca4a-58c8-11ea-ab68-101ecfec2532_story.html

      Delete
  30. Phil 10

    If a government attempted to round up, detain, and deport Latinos and Muslims, then I'll no choice but to leave because I wouldn't be welcome. I would feel sad and betrayed because the country I grew up just stripped my family of opportunities to live somewhat properly from years of working to be there in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If that was to ever happen would you try to fight back or would you go willingly? How would you explain to your children, assuming you would have any, what was happening?

      Delete
    2. What if you were a legal citizen? I don't believe giving in to oppression would be the best option! I would fight for my rights, regardless of the circumstances!

      #6

      Delete
    3. I understand how you would feel, I too would feel betrayed. The feeling of betrayal of only induce me to fight back, tell everyone my story.

      Delete
  31. PHIL 1030-009
    Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein was born on April 26th, 1889 in Vienna, Austria. His parents were Karl Wittgenstein and Leopoldine Wittgenstein. His parents ended up having seven other children and they were one of the richest families in Vienna, Austria. Ludwig’s parents, as well as some of his siblings were musically talented. Karl Wittgenstein tried to force his sons into the steel industry as work; however, three of Ludwig’s brothers ended up committing suicide for this very reason. As a child, Ludwig studied different subjects in school in England. He studied engineering, mathematics, and arithmetic. Ludwig was interested in learning about aeronautics. To further indulge his aeronautical interests, he attended the University of Cambridge. Throughout all of his education, Ludwig was interested in the answers to specific questions and determining logic out of things. However, after he left school, he decided that there is no factual logic. Eventually, Ludwig had to join the Austrian army to fight in World War I. This is where he said he learned things about the deeper meanings of morality and ethics. Ludwig related ethics and morality to logic. Basically he said that ethics and morality cannot simply be described in words, just like logic cannot be explained by facts. He published a book that expressed his ideas on logic, ethic, and morals. This book is titled Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. This book also expresses his ideas on meaning and the meaning behind logic, ethics, and morals. Eventually, Ludwig became a professor at the University of Cambridge. During his years as a professor and during his later life he created some more works. They are titled, Philosophical Investigations, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Philosophical Remarks, and Philosophical Grammar. However, supposedly Ludwig was not very proud of these works. This is mainly because many people proposed that Ludwig’s book, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, was somewhat narrow-minded. People suggested that the language used was not broad enough to encompass ideas behind the meaning of things. So, it is speculated that Ludwig was somewhat discouraged after these reviews were vocalized to the public. Some of Ludwig’s famous quotes include: “The limits of my language mean the limits of my world”, “If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done”, “Uttering a word is like striking a note on the keyboard of imagination”, and “The limits of my language means the limits of my world”. Ludwig was also interested in ideas on the body, soul, and conscious. One of his quotes is “The human body is the best picture of the human soul.” The fact that he had different ideas of the mind and body and did not link the two is quite fascinating. However, Ludwig supposedly even considered becoming a psychiatrist in his later years. This is most likely due to his interest in the meaning behind things. Eventually, Ludwig passed away. He passed away on April 29th, 1951. He died from prostate cancer.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Section 13

    Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more understanding the logic of language?
    - I do not think we should necessarily be silent about things we can't prove. I feel like if that were the case, a lot of people would be silent about a lot of things.

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    - I completely believe that ordinary people are capable of great evil. Not all murderers are total masterminds. School shooters are ordinary people with messed up minds.

    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?
    - If the government did this to people who have done no wrongdoing, it would be upsetting

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really like your responses here and totally agree with the evil one. Everyone has a little evil in them, it's naturally bred into us.

      Delete
  33. 12
    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    Words and language are tools used to thoughts and feelings but they can also be used to "paint pictures" of meaning in writing.

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    Any person is capable of some pretty deplorable actions in the right context. I don't believe concepts like good and evil truly hold much weight when examined deeply.

    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?
    Unfortunately, I know I wouldn't do much because many horrible actions have been committed by the government I live under in my life time and I have not done anything then. I would like to say that I could be more courageous and start protesting the things I dislike, but I am terrified of going to jail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:35 AM CDT

      With the first I agree that words can paint a cloud of imaginations and answers.
      The second one I agree because what happens in life is human nature and that we shouldn't be upheld to what happened all the time because its learning experiences.
      The third one I agree I would want to have a voice without being arrested but rather for them to listen understand and be more open minded.
      Section 11

      Delete
  34. Melissa Harwell12:40 PM CST

    Section 12
    Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    I think yes. It irritates me when somebody is going on about some sort of topic they either cannot prove, because they simply cannot prove it, or they just do not know enough facts.

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    Anybody can be capable of anything. It's hard to tell if something such as another Holocaust could happen again, or if there could be another Hitler. We cannot ever be so sure.

    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    I absolutely use words as pictorial meaning.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Cody Maness Section 118:34 AM CST

    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    I use it for all of these things. Language is a incredibly useful tool.

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    Everyone is capable of great evil, even me. People will do awful things in different circumstances. We can insure a Holocaust will never happen again by fighting against oppression of all kinds. I would teach my kids the importance of empathy and not being a bystander.

    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?
    I would be pissed and protest.

    - Cody Maness Section 11

    ReplyDelete
  36. So, the definition of ordinary is-- "with no special or distinctive features; normal". I think people are ordinary (normal) until they commit the crime. Once they commit the crime, they become abnormal, because committing great acts of evil is not a normal thing.

    So I think we all start out as ordinary. Ted Bundy was ordinary. Hitler was ordinary. Once they committed their crimes they were then taken to a different level.

    I see both sides though. Because someone who is ABLE to commit great crimes and not feel evil is abnormal. I consider myself ordinary and I know for a fact that I could never be evil. It just isn't in my DNA. I don't have the ability to physically or mentally intentionally hurt another person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think people are physically able to commit great evils, but morally they are not. Which shows the two sides of the question because those who have no sense of morals or mixed morals are the ones who do great evils. So I suppose if you emphasize ordinary then, no, most ordinary people do not commit great evils because, morally, they make themselves incapable.

      Delete
  37. 5
    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    People are capable of evil through the most simple of means, that of being indifferent. It doesn't take a million evil people to create a holocaust but rather millions of people that just go along for the ride and do not speak up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:37 AM CDT

      I agree we must voice what is wrong and come together to over come it.
      Section 11

      Delete
  38. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?

    I don't see anything wrong with this as long as you are also open to other's opinions and be aware that other people may have proof that you don't. As long as you know you might have to swallow your pride and admit that you're wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I don't think ordinary people are capable of great evil. to me its a matter of perspective its all in how you think and act and feel. If you set out to do evil then you may feel evil

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see your point, but I also think that there are certain situations that can cloud our judgement or force us to do things we would've never done in order to survive. The first thing that comes to mind is sailors and voyagers who became so starved that they engaged in cannibalism rather than die, even though the act went against everything they stood for and believed.
      Section #6

      Delete
  40. If the government decided to gather all the muslims and latinos for deportation i would honestly help them fight back. America is supposed to be a safe place for you and your families to come and have a better life. If someone tried to take that from me i would pissed so i could understand their anger.

    ReplyDelete
  41. https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/china-holds-million-uighur-muslims-concentration-camps-180912105738481.html
    I know this article is a bit old but to think that actually happened in this modern world astonishes me.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Death is not an event in life: we do not live to experience death. If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present. Our life has no end in the way in which our visual field has no limits.” This quote really talked to me because be sometimes think about death when they are suppose to just live there live and this is what I call living an unhealthy life

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A lot of people see death as inevitable and fixate on it. Many to the point that it becomes their number one fear. I've heard many people say "I want to do this or that before I die." It seems like it subconsciously becomes a task to complete before death rather than something they're doing for enjoyment. They feel the need to beat the clock for fear of the future rather than live in the present.
      Section 6

      Delete
  43. If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond

    As an immigrant myself, I would stand up for them in whatever ways I could. I'd go to protests and rallies. I'd donate to funds. I'd email our senators. Regardless of the reason, I believe everyone has their rights. Whether a small majority did something wrong or not, I think its completely unfair to lump in the entire population to that small group.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    I believe that is exactly what we use language for. Language can also be used to limit thought, not just to express it. In some cultures, thought is limited as a result of their language. They simply lack the words to express certain ideas, causing these ideas to never sprout in the first place. Language allows us to share ideas and communicate with each other as well. This leads us to technological and social advancements. I'd say language one of, if not the most, crucial aspect of our society.
    #6

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For this week:


      On April 20th: 1 home-page post “The 2020 Fantasyland Connection” on April 20th, 2 comments and 1 reply under April 21st quiz.

      On April 22nd: 2 comments and 2 replies under April 23rd quiz

      Total of 8 runs/2 bases

      Delete
  45. Anonymous3:27 AM CDT

    Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    No, we shouldn't I feel like stating our ideas would help grow a bigger conversation. I feel like they shouldn't but it never hurts to broaden their horizon.
    Section 11

    ReplyDelete
  46. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?

    I do believe that being silent is the best thing to do when we can not prove something. The person should instead gather proof that way you won't mislead someone with false information.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    I think anyone is capable of doing evil. I think that environmental factors contribute to someone doing evil. I think that I am not capable of doing evil because I grew up with a loving family and at a safe country. I think we can help prevent one by telling it's story and the victim's story, that way we can prevent that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. April 21- Responded to 2 Discussion Questions
      Commented on 2 of my classmate's Disscussion Question answers

      April 23- Responded to 2 Discussion Questions
      Commented on 2 of my classmate's Disscussion Question answers

      Total Runs for this week: 2
      Total bases for this week: 8

      Delete
  48. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    Anyone is capable of doing great evil, I am CAPABLE of great evil but that does not mean I will do great evil because of my moral standards. There is no way we can be sure that it won't happen but it is less likely to happen if we keep telling the story and spreading awareness.
    section 5

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, that the best thing we can do is continue to tell the story and talk about how these evil events begin and develop. Initially, no one could've predicted the outcome of WWII and the atrocities the Nazi party would commit. Likewise, we can never know the consequences of certain movements or creations. All we can do is make people cognizant of the possibility.
      Section #6

      4/21 Quiz
      Posted reply to 2 DQ’s in comment section under quiz
      Posted 3 replies to others’ comments in comment section under quiz

      4/23 Quiz
      Posted reply to 3 DQ’s in comment section under quiz
      Posted 3 replies to others’ comments in comment section under quiz

      Total for week: 11 bases/ 2 runs + 3 bases

      Delete
  49. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    I feel like the more you speak your mind, the more people will think about things that haven't been proven or things that they haven't thought about before.
    section 5

    ReplyDelete
  50. Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?
    I feel like that is exactly what it is used for. Whether it be talking to others, explaining a point, or expressing my thoughts and feelings, I believe its always used in this context.
    section 5

    ReplyDelete
  51. If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond
    I would be completely against it. I believe that no matter their origin they are American and have that basic right to stay in America. If they came here illegally on the other hand I would want them to at least be given some time to become legal rather than just deport them.
    section 5

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For this week:

      April 21-
      2 comments to DQ's in "Quiz 21"
      2 replies to DQ's in "Quiz 21"

      April 23-
      4 comments to DQ's in "Quiz 23"

      TOTAL: 8 bases/ 2 runs

      Delete
  52. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?

    I don't believe so. I don't think philosophy would be as grand as it is today if they had "kept silent". There are many, many different things that you should never keep silent about even if you cannot prove it to be true. How do you think vaccinations, medicines, and treatments have been discovered? Even though they couldnt prove that it could help anyone, their creators still pushed on and developed medicines and other things that could help treat people in need. What about abuse situations? If you suspect something is going on should you just keep silent? These all may be completely different situations but all hold the same background for all of them. If someone had kept silent, new ideas, chances and developments wouldn't be out there. Although different, they are all helping the world in their own way a little bit at a time.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    I believe every person has a natural evil in them. Evil has been embedded in humans since the Garden of Eden. I don't there is a guarantee that something like the Holocaust isn't going to happen again. It could be in my time or a later time. We can all look back upon that and think of how horrible it is, but if you get one person with enough power and greed of themself, and not enough people to defy it, who's to say it wont happen again. The world and people work in horrible ways. I will 100% teach my children about the past, good or bad, because it has built our today. We all need to be aware of what has happened in the past. It builds us and our future.

    Section #6

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For this week:
      4-21: 2 comments, 3 replies on quiz.
      4-23: 2 comments, 2 replies on quiz.

      11 bases = 2 runs, 3 extra bases

      Delete
  54. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    Absolutely. Evil to me just means extremely immoral with that intention. I think many people do great evils daily without realizing it, which makes it not as evil. Someone could easily (sadly, and I do not mean to desensitize these tragic events) commit a school shooting or drive their car into a public area. I can legally go buy a gun or a car to do both of those, but that's not necessarily EASY for me or most people because, thank goodness, they are morally stable and functioning members of society. I think teaching about the Holocaust and events like it are crucial to their prevention, but not just the event the morals and philosophy behind them that make them so wrong. Of course I'll teach my children about things like this and slavery and World Wars because I trust myself more than a teacher, I want to ensure that they are able to morally decipher things for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?

    i dont think we should be silent about things we cant prove but we also shouldnt assert things as facts about the subject if we cant prove them. a certain degree of caution is necessary when talking about ideas we are not completely familiar with. speaking towards a subject even if youre not confident in what your saying can stir up discussion about it and possibly lead to a concrete answer that otherwise might not have come up if you hadnt spoken up. (section #6)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm completely with you on this one. There are some things that deserve our attention, even without complete proof. Many ethical dilemmas are often hazy and unverifiable, but it's still important to speak up for what you believe is right. However, it is also just as important to look at things logically and analyze these situations as best as you can.
      Section #6

      Delete
  56. Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    i think that all of the above apply and much more. i use language to communicate my ideas, feelings, and thoughts. some form of language is essential to being able to survive by communicating your needs to someone else. we use language to ask for help when we need it and to help other people out when they need it. (section #6)

    ReplyDelete
  57. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    i believe anyone is capable of great evil deep down inside them. we may not be aware of it or even acknowledge it but anything is possible. i dont think its possible to be sure the holocaust will never happen again as much as we would want to say that. all it takes is just one person and their ability to create a following to work towards an evil goal. surely this will be a hard task to do given our previous experience of the disastrous holocaust, but the skeptic in me will have to say that anything is possible. (section #6)

    ReplyDelete
  58. If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond
    im sure many would respond in anger disgust and shock at this attempt by the government. me being Hispanic the thought of possibly my family members being deported would bring me sadness and anger towards the government. protests about this event would surely arise and general distrust towards the government would be prevalent in the community. (section #6)

    4/21/2020: responded to 3 DQ's in comment section under quiz
    Replied to 1 of peers post
    4/23/2020: responded to 4 DQ's in comment section under quiz
    total for week 8 bases/ 2 runs


    ReplyDelete
  59. In regards to Discussion Question one, I believe that we should not be silent about things that we cannot prove because even though we may not know any facts, it is still interesting to find out things that we didn't know. I don't think that Philosophy should concern itself with the understanding of language. In the world, there are some things that will probably never receive a logical explanation, and there is simply too many languages that are spoken right now to know every single aspect of every single language.
    section 5

    ReplyDelete
  60. Michael DeLay4:43 PM CDT

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    I think everyone is just an ordinary person. Anyone is capable of doing evil things. I think it just depends on the background and experiences of a person. If that person has had bad things done to them or had a bad experience growing up It would be easier for them to do evil acts. Than someone who hasn't experienced those things
    Sec 5

    ReplyDelete
  61. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    - No, how would we have proven anything if we stayed quiet about topic at hand. We may not be able to prove everything but by talking and communicating we are able to solve many problems. However, philosophy is the love of knowledge, to only concern itself with the logic of language, philosophy would not expand expand as efficiently.
    Section 11

    ReplyDelete
  62. Should we be silent about things we can't prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?
    I believe that we shouldn't be silent about things we can't prove. Because if we silent about things we can't prove, there will be no answer. In order for us to get the answer, we need to inform others and influence others so, we can find things that we couldn't prove. And philosophy should concern itself and understanding the logic of language because the more we know, the more advance we are as a human.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?
    Well, anyone can be capable of great evil. Because if there is good, there is evil. What i'm trying to say is, if human have a good side, there has to be an evil side as well. And in order for a tragedy like Holocaust will never happen, we need to learn and teach younger generations what is good and evil.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?
    - I do believe that the banality of evil is current still today, from a tiny white lie to unintentional manslaughter, to murder. Such actions require an action, meaning that even if you may not mean to do evil, all it takes is the action to do it. Many people act out of spite, stress, and fear pushing people to do the unimaginable without any real intent behind it.
    Section 11

    ReplyDelete
  65. If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond.
    If the government attempted to round up, deatain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims it will be another tragedy of Holocaust. The government are basically, destroying someone's else life. And many people will be against it because in a time like this, where races come together as one, I believe that there will be a big protest against the government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a great point of view. We live today in age were people are just waiting for the chance to upraise against the government, otherwise what has stopped them from doing such actions to said magnitude.
      section 11

      Delete
    2. I'm not sure that you can compare the deportation of illegal immigrants to the Holocaust. That might be a little too much. However, there are bigger issues we need to solve now than the illegal immigration issue. I think there will be some backlash if that were to happen.

      Delete
  66. If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?
    - Its hard to say what I would do, I would protest. If anyone came to me for shelter I would welcome them with open arms. One of the main challenges that would raise up is "if my parents will allow such action and endangerment. I would contact everyone I know to make sure they are safe and aware of the situation.
    Section 11

    ReplyDelete
  67. April 14, 2020
    4 DQ responses
    (4 bases= 1 run)
    April 23, 2020
    3 DQ responses
    1 reply to classmate
    (4 bases= 1 run)
    section 11

    ReplyDelete
  68. Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    I use language as a medium to express how I feel as well as for managing relationships. I think that is what most people see language as. Now wether that is vocally or via rhetoric is different from person to person. I think that other people are able to express how they feel and the message they'd like to get across by other mediums like art and music.

    ReplyDelete
  69. How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again?

    I find it very hard to believe that there could be another situation like the Holocaust. Countries around the world would fight to protect anyone no matter what race they were. I think lack of social media is a reason that the Holocaust lasted for as long as it did in that not everyone knew about it when they could have if there was social media.

    ReplyDelete
  70. April 21
    Responded to “Have you ever read a book that changed your mind about something important to you? What would you say to Bertrand Russell and J.S. Mill about the First Cause Argument?”
    Responded to Ty H.
    Responded to Isaac Ibarra.
    Responded to Bailey

    April 23
    Responded to “Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?”
    Commented on Pau Khai’s post
    Responded to “How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again?”
    Commented on Kirolos Michael

    8 bases/ 2 runs

    ReplyDelete
  71. Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    I use language mainly as a tool for managing social relationships.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Are ordinary people capable of great evil?

    Yes. I think either by extreme pressure or by unknowingly having their world view changed.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?

    I think so because of amount of information and news that we are exposed to everyday.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Should we be silent about things we can't prove?

    I think so because then we wouldn't be wasting time on useless things.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Scorecard:
    4 replies on Quiz April 21
    4 replies on Quiz April 23

    2 runs

    ReplyDelete
  76. Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    I definitely think so. Unless you're born into fame or royalty, I think everyone starts out as an ordinary person. We all have the potential to commit great evils, it really depends on the circumstance and the environment. It's plausible to say that if Hitler was born in another place and in another time, the specific elements that accommodated and intensified the evils inside him that led to the Holocaust wouldn't have been present. While I consider myself a compassionate and ethical person, there are some potential situations that might compel me to behave in a more animalistic and malicious way, especially if I felt threatened or trapped. I think we all have it in us in some way, but we also have the power to choose differently. I would teach my children about the influence of both nature and nurture and how it can create some incredibly hurt people who express their pain by making others hurt as well. I will also teach them that the most courageous thing you can do in these situations is meet these people's anger with kindness, and no matter the circumstance, it is always in your power to choose empathy.
    Section #6

    ReplyDelete
  77. Is "the banality of evil" relevant to our time?

    I think this is always relevant. There are many ideas and efforts started by decent people with good intentions that gradually turn malevolent due to the time and circumstance. It only takes a little greed or arrogance from a small group of people to create a snowball effect that gets out of hand. It's important to understand that most people don't see themselves as the villain in the story and might even think they're working for the greater good.
    Section #6

    ReplyDelete
  78. If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond

    I would do whatever I could to boycott, protest, and spread the word that this goes against what America stands for. I would participate in the marches and events near me and give in any way I could. I think it would be vital to get people to see this injustice as a betrayal of our nation's ideals and an attack on all of our freedom, not just Latinos and Muslims.
    Section #6

    ReplyDelete
  79. Sec. 11

    Should we be silent about things we cannot prove? Should philosophy concern itself with more than understanding the logic of language?

    I believe that people should voice their opinion about anything that they strongly believe in because that is how change happens; however, sometimes there is a right and wrong time to express certain things. For example, a person who believes they are being haunted by a ghost cannot just share that information with people without getting some skeptical looks. So, that person should seek help silently and then share their stories.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Sec. 11

    Do you use language as a pictorial medium, a tool for managing social relationships and expressing our thoughts and feelings, or what?

    Language, and pretty much words period, have the general purpose of helping humans of all cultures share thoughts and feeling. I also believe that expression even goes beyond traditional human language, which is where language comes from.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Sec. 11

    Are ordinary people capable of great evil? Are you? How can we be sure that a Holocaust will never happen again? What will you teach your children about that?

    Great evil, in my opinion, means mass evil. Basically, evil that affects lots of people instead of just one or a few people. I believe great evil is a state of mind and any person intending to inflict such evil only requires the proper mindset. There is no guarantee that the Holocaust will never happen again. To be honest, I believe that it is happening but in a more modern fashion. The brutality and discrimination against black people in this country is no secret, and thousands of people die annually from racism related shootings. I am going to educate my children on every cruel act in history, especially those that target us specifically.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Sec. 11

    If the government attempted to round up, detain, and deport millions of Latinos and Muslims, how would you respond?

    Honestly, I would be among many to rebel, protest, and/or boycott because I am black; therefore, I know what it is like to be discriminated against and be treated unfairly because of race. So, naturally the next steps would be to return to the open abuse of us. Do not be surprised if I lead the resistance.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Sec. 11

    Apr. 21: I posted 2 comments to the Quiz (LH 31-33; FL 37-39) and 2 DQ (“What’s your ‘essence’?” and “What does it mean to say that women are made, not born?”)

    Apr. 23: I posted 4 comments to the DQ questions.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.