Up@dawn 2.0

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Matteo Ricci (11/5)

Katie, Robb, Dave, Shawn, Jamie






Matteo Ricci
Matteo RicciBorn: 6-Oct-1552
Birthplace: Macerata, Italy
Died: 11-May-1610
Location of death: Beijing, China
Cause of death: unspecified
Remains: Buried, Zhalan Cemetery, Beijing, China
Gender: Male
Religion: Roman Catholic
Race or Ethnicity: White
Occupation: Religion
Nationality: Italy
Executive summary: Jesuit missionary to China
Italian missionary to China, born of a noble family at Macerata in the March of Ancona on the 7th of October 1552. After some education at a Jesuit college in his native town he went to study law at Rome, where in 1571, in opposition to his father's wishes, he joined the Society of Jesus.

In 1577 Ricci and other students offered themselves for the East Indian missions. Ricci, without visiting his family to take leave, proceeded to Portugal. His comrades were Rudolfo Acquaviva, Nicolas Spinola, Francesco Pasio and Michele Ruggieri, all afterwards, like Ricci himself, famous in the Jesuit annals. They arrived at Goa in September 1578. After four years spent in India, Ricci was summoned to the task of opening China to evangelization.

Several fruitless attempts had been made by Xavier, and since his death, to introduce the Church into China -- as by Melchior Nunes of the Jesuit Society operating from Sanchian in 1555; by Gaspar da Cruz, a Dominican, in that or the following year; by the Augustinians under Martin Herrada, 1575; and in 1579 by the Franciscans led by Pedro d'Alfaro. In 1571 a house of the Jesuits had been set up at Macao (where the Portuguese were established in 1557), but their attention was then occupied with Japan, and it was not until the arrival at Macao of Alessandro Valignani on a visitation in 1582 that work in China was really taken up. For this object he had obtained the services first of Ruggieri and then of Ricci. After various disappointments they found access to Chow-king-fu on the Si-Kiang or West River of Canton, where the viceroy of the two provinces of Kwang-tung and Kwang-si then had his residence, and by his favor were able to establish themselves there for some years. Their proceedings were very cautious and tentative; they excited the curiosity and interest of even the more intelligent Chinese by their clocks, their globes and maps, their books of European engravings, and by Ricci's knowledge of mathematics, including dialling and the projection of maps. They conciliated some influential friends, and their reputation spread widely in China. This was facilitated by the Chinese system of transfer of public officers from one province of the empire to another, and in the later movements of the missionaries they frequently met with one and another of their old acquaintances in office, who were more or less well disposed. Eventually troubles at Chow-king compelled them to seek a new home; and in 1589, with the viceroy's sanction, they migrated to Chang-chow in the northern part of Kwang-tung, not far from the well-known Meiling Pass.

During his stay here Ricci was convinced that a mistake had been made in adopting a dress resembling that of the bonzes, a class who were the objects either of superstition or of contempt. With the sanction of the visitor it was ordered that in future the missionaries should adopt the costumes of Chinese literates, and, in fact, they before long adopted Chinese manners altogether.
Chang-chow, as a station, did not prove a happy selection, but it was not until 1595 that an opportunity occurred of travelling northward. For some time Ricci's residence was at Nan-chang-fu, the capital of Kiang-si; but in 1598 he was able to proceed under favorable conditions to Nan-king, and from there for the first time to Peking, which had all along been the goal of his missionary ambition. But circumstances were not then propitious, and the party had to return to Nan-king. The fame of the presents which they carried had, however, reached the court, and the Jesuits were summoned north again, and on the 24th of January 1601 they entered the capital. Wan-li, the emperor of the Ming dynasty, in those days lived in seclusion, and saw no one but his women and the eunuchs. But the missionairies were summoned to the palace; their presents were immensely admired, and the emperor had the curiosity to send for portraits of the fathers themselves.

They obtained a settlement, with an allowance for subsistence, in Peking, and from this time to the end of his life Ricci's estimation among the Chinese was constantly increasing, as was at the same time the amount of his labors. Visitors thronged the mission house incessantly; and inquiries came to him from all parts of the empire respecting the doctrines which he taught, or the numerous Chinese publications which he issued. This in itself was a great burden, as Chinese composition, if wrong impressions are to be avoided, demands extreme care and accuracy. As head of the mission, which now had four stations in China, he also devoted much time to answering the letters of the priests under him, a matter on which he spared no pains or detail. New converts had to be attended to -- always welcomed, and never hustled away. Besides these came the composition of his Chinese books, the teaching of his people and the maintenance of the record of the mission history which had been enjoined upon him by the general of the order, and which he kept well up to date. Thus his labors were wearing and incessant. In May 1610 he broke down, and after an illness of eight days died on the 11th of that month. His colleague Pantoja applied to the emperor for a burying-place outside the city. This was granted, with the most honorable official testimonies to the reputation and character of Ricci; and a large building in the neighborhood of the city was at the same time bestowed upon the mission for their residence.

Ricci's work was the foundation of the subsequent success attained by the Roman Catholic Church in China. When the missionaries of other Roman Catholic orders made their way into China, twenty years later, they found great fault with the manner in which certain Chinese practices had been dealt with by the Jesuits, a matter in which Ricci's action and policy had given the tone to the mission in China -- though in fact that tone was rather inherent in the Jesuit system than the outcome of individual character, for controversies of an exactly parallel nature arose two generations later in southern India, between the Jesuits and Capuchins, regarding what were called "Malabar rites." The controversy thus kindled in China burned for considerably more than a century with great fierceness. The chief points were (1) the lawfulness and expediency of certain terms employed by the Jesuits in naming God Almighty, such as Tien, "Heaven", and Shang-ti, "Supreme Ruler" or "Emperor", instead of Tien-Chu, "Lord of Heaven", and in particular the erection of inscribed tablets in the churches, on which these terms were made use of; (2) in respect to the ceremonial offerings made in honor of Confucius, and of personal ancestors, which Ricci had recognized as merely civil observances; (3) the erection of tablets in honor of ancestors in private houses; and (4), more generally, sanction and favor accorded to ancient Chinese sacred books and philosophical doctrine, as not really trespassing on Christian faith.





5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ricci is an interesting case study. On one side we see an eager man wanting to volunteer to go to China to be a missionary and convert the Chinese people to Catholicism. On the other side I see a man that seemingly is obsessed by the NUMBER of "converts" he makes, so he, as it points out on page 313,

    "was blamed for having introduced Jesus to China as a force small enough to fit into a world of polytheism and atheism without much of a ripple".

    Is that the point of converting someone to your religion? If you need to dilute or blend your beliefs to obtain the desired results, I must question your real intentions. Was Ricci's biggest objectives to convert the Chinese people or was it to "quasi-convert" them thru a blend of Catholicism and the Chinese atheism in order to be able to report back to the Church that great things were occurring under his watch and tutelage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looking forward: ENGLISH DEISTS

      FACTUAL: What was the main concern of philosophers of the time in criticizing religion: A: BEING BEHEADED

      DISCUSSION: How can the huge differences between the Old Testament and the New Testament be explained? (Is it like Collins suggested- "The soul was a transplanted idea, from the land of mystery cults and animal worship"?)

      Delete
  3. We talked about this in class last Thursday some but thats one thing I can no stand is people trying to convert people to there religion. There is several different religions out there today and they are out there for a reason. I believe that reason is because someone obviously didn't like any of the religions that were available to them so they made there own. This happens all the time and I say let people believe in what they want to believe in and don't hustle people or try to convert them just because you think your religion is the one and only way. No one will ever know whose religion is the right way if there even is a right way. Did this guys go over there to be a missionary or really to see how many people he could convert? Also I think if he did go over there to be a missionary he should have went over there to do some kind of good work and not force his religion on other people. People are going to do what they want to do anyways and there is never stopping anyone but it just really turns me off when someone is trying to force some kind of religion on me all because there religion is the "right one" and "only one".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:24 AM CDT

    I agree with Jamie on this that peoples religious beliefs should be respected even if they aren't the same as yours. People too often want to judge you for your beliefs without taking into account that there are billions of people out there with hundreds of thousands of different belief systems. “I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” Stephen Roberts

    Discussion: Does this quote confuse (ex. hurt your heads) you the way it confuses me?

    Factual: What controversial names for god were used by the Jesuit mercenaries? (Tien, Shang-ti)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.