Up@dawn 2.0

Monday, October 17, 2016

H3

Are space and time somehow dependent on the relations among objects, or independent of those relations?


First, there is the question of the ontology of space and time considered within the framework of what Kant would regard as the dogmatic metaphysics of the seventeenth century. This framework might suggest that if space and time are to exist, or to characterize the physical world, they must be considered either substances in their own right, or else properties of some substance. Space and time seem distinct from substances because they are causally inert, causally inaccessible—their aspects or properties cannot be altered by interacting with any other substance—and imperceptible. Since they are often regarded as infinite, moreover, some thinkers have doubted that they could be substances, as God is often thought of as the sole infinite substance. However, it is also difficult to think of space and time as properties of any substance, for then they would presumably be dependent on that substance for their existence. If we regard them as dependent on any contingent substance, it seems that we would be committed to the idea that space and time could fail to exist, or could disappear, depending on the happenings of that contingent substance.

2 comments:

  1. (H3) Here is a pitch, what is space and time were but illusions, or perception of the instantaneous flash existence and then collapse of reality. Space and Time is merely how we perceive the rapid spreading out and dispersion of matter before collapsing in again and repeating. What if it is only an illusion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Space and time are frameworks for us to make sense of the vast cosmic reality which we live in and are constucts of human imagination

    ReplyDelete