Are space and time somehow dependent on the relations among
objects, or independent of those relations?
First, there is the question of the ontology of space and
time considered within the framework of what Kant would regard as the dogmatic
metaphysics of the seventeenth century. This framework might suggest that if
space and time are to exist, or to characterize the physical world, they must
be considered either substances in their own right, or else properties of some
substance. Space and time seem distinct from substances because they are
causally inert, causally inaccessible—their aspects or properties cannot be
altered by interacting with any other substance—and imperceptible. Since they
are often regarded as infinite, moreover, some thinkers have doubted that they
could be substances, as God is often thought of as the sole infinite substance.
However, it is also difficult to think of space and time as properties of any
substance, for then they would presumably be dependent on that substance for
their existence. If we regard them as dependent on any contingent substance, it
seems that we would be committed to the idea that space and time could fail to
exist, or could disappear, depending on the happenings of that contingent
substance.
(H3) Here is a pitch, what is space and time were but illusions, or perception of the instantaneous flash existence and then collapse of reality. Space and Time is merely how we perceive the rapid spreading out and dispersion of matter before collapsing in again and repeating. What if it is only an illusion.
ReplyDeleteSpace and time are frameworks for us to make sense of the vast cosmic reality which we live in and are constucts of human imagination
ReplyDelete