Arthur
Schopenhauer
The
Beautiful, the Stimulating, and the Sublime
For Schopenhauer,
everyone has the ability to experience the aesthetics of the world. But what is
aesthetic experience and how can one truly achieve this state of mind? Well
according to Schopenhauer, this experience is bound within the individual’s
“will,” which is the inner essence in us that connects us all to the universe and
to each other. Bound within your will is your striving self, this is ones inner
form that drives you to carry out actions for one’s self to satisfy wants and
pleasures. So for one to truly experience the aesthetic world, one must
distance his or herself from the will into a “will-less” perception. To do this
you must detach from your striving self and look objects for their essence
instead of how you would connect it to your striving self. According to
Schopenhauer and others like Kant, they felt that the general will of humans
contains suffering since it strives off of our wants and desires. So in this
sense, aesthetic will-lessness is seen as an escape from pain into a world of
wonders.
Beauty- When the mind
reaches a tranquil state and crosses into the will-less with little transitional
help, then this means one has experienced beauty. This is seen mostly when we
look at flowers or even of the faces of people we love. For Schopenhauer beauty
is something that comes to us without thought.
Stimulating-
Certain aspects can be distracting to the viewer and take away from the true
aesthetic experience, he referred to these as “contemplation-resistant objects.”
These aspects come in two main forms:
Positively stimulating-Things that are positive stimulators
would be a nicely roasted turkey or even a glass of water because these things can
stir the appetite and, in turn, block out the real or intended emotions being
felt. This is almost directly related to ones striving self. He also applied
this to nudes or things that today we would consider “pornographic” in nature
and should not be used in art.
Negatively stimulating- The negative aspect applies to
things that repulse people, what Schopenhauer referred to as the disgusting.
Things like urine and feces that would ultimately cause people to feel disgust
or horror should not be used in art for the same reasons as positive aspects,
these objects put emotions and feelings in us that relate to outside forces and
should not be used in any work of art.
( musicians that rely on sex
Sublime- The most
interesting aspect in my opinion of Schopenhauer’s theory of art is his
explanation of the sublime. This is the intense feeling of hostility to one’s
life or any feeling that would leave the viewer trapped in an overpowering
sense of insignificance within the universe. Unlike the stimulating, which
leaves the viewer without any aesthetic appreciation of the art, these feelings
of hostility and fear could cross over and when this happens, the feeling is
that of the sublime. When dealing with the sublime, one must take into
consideration two accounts: one that is dynamical sublime which deals with the
physical aspects mostly associated with dramas and tragedies. The second is the
mathematical sublime which deals with psychological aspects seen most in nature
as the starry night sky. To take account for how we could possibly feel any joy
or pleasure from seeing such tragedy, Schopenhauer states that we must
acknowledge the sheer vastness or fear that the object represents and then
“consciously turn away” from these emotions. This is how we experience the
dramatics, by putting ourselves within the story to know that fear and feeling
of hopelessness that the cast is portraying but then also simultaneously
comprehending that you are where you are, viewing this play from afar and are
in no real danger.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/schopenhauer-aesthetics/#SchMetAes
http://users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/articles/ney48218.htm
"The most interesting aspect in my opinion of Schopenhauer’s theory of art is his explanation of the sublime. This is the intense feeling of hostility to one’s life or any feeling that would leave the viewer trapped in an overpowering sense of insignificance within the universe." I agree, it is the most interesting thing about his aesthetics. But I don't understand sublimity as hostility. I always thought of it as a majestic and wondrous feeling, the mere having of which makes us MORE significant.
ReplyDeleteOne pedantic little thing I have to point out: it's MILL. No "s" at the end. Rhymes with free will.