David
Hume
Taste
and the Common sentiments of mankind
Before Hume came along
the art world was a place that only the elite could stand in, pieces were
judged by intricacy and attention to detail but that all changed with the idea
of taste. Taste referred more to the emotions one felt when experiencing a
certain work of art, this led the way for the aesthetic experience. This shifted
the entire aspect of how art was viewed and opened the way for an evolution in
style and experience. This also created two contradictory means of
interpretation: on one hand if something is beautiful to someone then that is
the end of the conversation, but one would also agree that Picasso has more artistic
flare than a street sign. To counter this notion Hume devised standards for
taste distinguishing between high standards and low standards. Hume also created two tests for determining
standards:
Test
1
1. Right
person to examine art, one who has a “fragile imagination”
2. Practice
looking at pieces of art to distinguish the good from the bad
3. Take
more than one if not several looks at the art before making a decision
4. Compare
the work along with others like it
5. Free
the mind from all predetermined judgment and prejudice
Test
2
The second test is merely the test of time for once a piece
has surpassed ages of art culture it has become part of the common sentiments
of mankind. Today pieces like Leonardo Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa and Vincent Van
Gogh’s starry night have stood the test of time and are considered some of the
greatest works ever done but at the time they were painted that was not the
common belief: Makes you wonder what pieces in our life time will be considered
the next great work of art.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.