Up@dawn 2.0

Saturday, December 7, 2019

The Debate of Human Nature - Stephen Byers Section 13


     Human nature as defined by the Britannica Encyclopedia is the “fundamental disposition and traits of humans”. Throughout all of time great thinkers and philosophers have debated the traits of human nature, and if certain traits are learned or if they are innate. It is also debated if the essence of human nature even exists. According to Aristotle, the study of human nature originated with Socrates, who related studies of the heavens to the studies of human things. Plato thought that humans were rational, social animals, and connected our nature with our souls and not our bodies, differing from Aristotle, who believed both our body and soul contributed to our human identity. 
For the thinkers who believe in our species having human nature, here are some generally agreed upon categories that are believed to be part of any human naturally.
1. Being Playful / Being Entertained. All mammals play, but humans pursue a much wider variety of entertainment and spend much more time enjoying themselves.
2. Being Scientific. As children we learn how to understand puzzles, patterns, and more. Our species is constantly sorting the world into categories, predicting things and checking our predictions. 
3. Being Legislative. We can't speculate that every human naturally has formal laws, but by nature us humans tend to set rules. They are generally comprised of three categories.
     -Kinship. the rights and connections relating to blood related families. (for example: parents providing for offspring, Offspring inheriting land or belongings)
     -Safety. Desire of safety is always an important trait in humans, and rules are generally made to secure safety, for example a culture governing whether someone can kill another person or not.
     -Use of Objects. Societies everywhere and in the past have rules that govern who can and cannot use certain things at certain times, or go certain places.
4. Being Epicurean. It means to be adapted to luxury or indulgence in sensual pleasures, especially in eating and drinking. 



5. Being Clandestine about Sex. Being clandestine means to be secretive or private aboout something, usually because it is inappropriate. One could say this is due to centuries of social conditioning, however studies have shown that private sex also happens in other species that have inter-male competition.
6. Being Gossipy. Humans by nature like to bond over having similar opinions. According to Robin Dunbar, the author of "Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language, "Gossip isn't negative by nature... it's not that we like to bitch, it's just that we like to talk". 


The other argument, obviously, is that human nature doesn't exist at all and that we are all formed by how we are raised and the events that happen during our time alive. The way we are depends entirely on our experiences. Everything humans "tend to do" can be explained. It is also argued that whatever is believed of human nature is not completely true across the world, but rather only applicable to certain cultures and societies. Some also say that there are aspects of human nature like smiling and laughing that are considered universal. However, these behaviors exist in other animals, so it couldn't be human nature to do them, but rather an evolutionary trait that humans have received. 
QUIZ QUESTIONS
1: According to Aristotle, the study of Human Nature originated with what Philosopher?
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1: Do you believe that Human Nature exists, and why?
2. If so, how can you explain the large amounts of people that do not match the general laws of human nature?
Sources:
Posts I have commented on:

-Stephen Byers Section 13


1 comment:

  1. Interesting list, but different humans express them in differing degrees. Some are deficient in playfulness but strong in scientific curiosity, others are more epicurean or stoical, etc. So maybe it makes more sense to speak in the plural of human natures, depending in each case on the particular mix of traits an individual happens to express, and not of a singular and monolithic Human Nature. Of course we do all possess a shared biological nature, and within specific cultures and subcultures we share traits that have been reinforced by local norms. It's all a continuum, ranging from the universal to the idiosyncratic particular. And this sort of pluralism is good, no?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.