Up@dawn 2.0

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Aesthetics

Esmeralda Ramirez
Section 11



When thinking about the word “Aesthetics,” one immediately thinks about questions like “What is a work of art?”  This highlights the essence of aesthetics.


                                     Aesthetics: the definition of aesthetics

To begin, the word, “aesthetics” itself originates from the Greek word, “Aisthetikos,” which can be defined as “of sense perception”. The philosophy of aesthetics can be summarized as the study of beauty and taste, although the study of aesthetics is broad in scope. Aesthetics can also be thought of as being a part of axiology which is defined as the study of value and the value of judgements.


                                      Pioneers in the study of Aesthetics:

During the 18th century, prominent figures like Hume and Kant were influential theorist who published works regarding the topic of aesthetics. During this time, they were mainly making aesthetic judgements. Being more specific, both philosophers were motivated by the question of whether our highly subjective and even irrational responses to artwork and other beautiful objects can have any sort of objectivity, according to Theodore Gracyk.

 
                    Immanuel Kant:
  In the “Critique of the Power Judgement,” Kant provides an analysis of aesthetic judgement which focuses on the beautiful and sublime. Both judgements in beauty and sublime are based on feelings, especially those that emphasize pleasure and liking.  More specifically, Kant viewed sublime as the feelings of superiority of own power of reason as a supersensible faculty, over nature.  S Sublime is also viewed as being two parts: the dynamically sublime and mathematically sublime. The mathematically sublime revolves more around the feelings of reasons which are superior to imagination which can cause displeasure.  On the other hand, the dynamically sublime is considered “a power that has no domain over us.” An example of this would be when nature causes fearful experiences even though we are safe from the danger. Here in dynamically sublime the displease is caused by the awareness of our powerlessness, physical, in the face of nature.







                                       David Hume
         Besides writing about moral philosophy and theories 
regarding emotion and thought, Hume also wrote about the 
aesthetic theory. Some of Hume’s work focus on the aesthetics of taste, pleasure, utility, and pain which revolved more around the experience of the person. That is why aesthetic subjectivism attracted Hume. In his work, “Of the Standard of Taste” Hume argues that rules cannot be produced regarding objects being tasteful. But there is a bit of an exception. When a reliable critic of taste is sensible and unprejudiced then it can be considered objective.






                       Modern Aesthetics:
        
Croce is an important 19th century influence on modern aesthetics. In Estetica, he presents and distinguishes “concept from intuition.” Which means that art is first acknowledged as an expression and then as intuition. Which is mainly how modern aesthetics is seen today throughout pop culture.









Quiz Questions
1.  From what culture is the word aesthetics derived from?
2.  During which century were Humes and Kant making important contributions to aesthetics?
3. How would Kant define aesthetics?


Discussion Questions
1.  Are art and beauty essentially related?
2. Is everything we see beautiful?
3.  How can one measure the beauty of an object?


Sources:
https://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_aesthetics.html
https://www.iep.utm.edu/aestheti/


Blog Post Comments:



1 comment:

  1. "feelings of superiority of own power of reason as a supersensible faculty" - that's pretty cryptic. Isn't sublimity really just a perception of beauty of a majestic and only partly-expressible scale? Was Kant right to insist that it necessarily engages reason, as opposed to feeling?

    "When a reliable critic of taste is sensible and unprejudiced then it can be considered objective" - or better, I think, inte-subjective: that is, sensible and unprejudiced critics appeal to more of us, and predispose us to think their taste is not just theirs but many of ours too... and that makes their taste less idiosyncratically subjective.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.