The reason, we find out, that Voldemort could not kill Harry during their second to last encounter is because long ago when Voldemort killed James and Lily Potter and tried to kill Harry, he could not and a horcrux was placed in Harry accidentally. When Harry comes back, he kills Voldemort with a simple spell, proving that good will always prevail over evil. Voldemort, would obviously be the "devil" figure in the series. Once a good student, like the devil was once a good angel, Voldemort, or Tom Riddle as he was known back then grew power hungry and unsatisfied by normal spells. He wanted to live forever and in order to do so he created horcruxes, which contained broken pieces of his soul so that if one part of him died, another would be living elsewhere. Throughout the series, he tempts Harry, just as the devil tempted Jesus time and time again.
Aristotle used a term known as perfectionism, which is the belief that virtue consists of realization of potentials unique to humanity such as the use of reason. This is relevant because Harry is constantly realizing his potential and performing virtuous acts to help "humanity" or more specifically the wizarding community. He puts himself into dangerous situations, not to get the glory of prevailing, but for the good of the wizarding world. Plato's view is that goodness is part of an eternal realm of ideas or forms and that it is the greatest one of all. I think that everyone can find something good in Harry Potter, and that Harry can give you hope, too. For me, personally, he will always be "the boy who lived."
Isn't Harry's goodness very particular to him, and the situations we see him confront? His is not really a Platonic" or Ideal goodness but actual? (Ironic, for a fictional character, but still...)
ReplyDelete