Do
you see the “mixed constitution” (114) as a healthy precursor of our balance of
powers, or a foreshadowing of political dissolution and mob rule? Does modern
democratic man “live from day to day” without order or restraint? (115) Was
Plato prescient about class struggle between rich and poor and the “dismal
cycle” of decay and revolution “without end or purpose”? (116)
Don Enss
James Madison is
considered by most historians to be the Father of the Constitution. Madison
like other colonial leaders were students of Greek and Latin and were
well-versed in the Classics. Madison did what Aristotle had done prior to
writing about Politics. Before the
convention in Philadelphia, he devoted several months to studying the
governments of many countries and noted their strengths and weaknesses. This
allowed him to guide the delegates in their discussions and compromises in
crafting the constitution.
It is important to remember that the delegates
to the Constitutional Convention were almost all well-to-do, white, propertied males
who were drafting a constitution that would be used to govern the United States
and protect their interests. They represented the “elite” in the country and
were treated with a greater measure of respect than some of our current leaders
because the populace had seen their contribution in winning independence from
England and knew that they had placed their property, fortunes, and lives on
the line.
The original draft of the Constitution was
very limited and included no protection for an individual’s rights. Thomas
Jefferson in Paris, France during the convention exerted his influence to have certain
rights included in the final document. Madison who was close to Jefferson
included twelve amendments, the first ten of which are the Bill of Rights. They
satisfied the concerns of those male citizens about a federal government that would
exericse too much power, and insured that the Constitution would be ratified by
the necessary nine states.
Clearly, dividing the
government into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial borrowed
from the Greek and Roman governments.
While almost all Americans were reluctant to consider the president as a
monarch, the (One), he was the titular head of state, they recognized the elite
(Few) as the colonial aristocrats, and the (Many) as themselves. This system
worked because neither branch had so much power that it overwhelmed the other
two. While each carried out the functions and powers designated to them, they
were not above trying to take more power if they could wrest it from the others
and that continues to today.
Fortunately, the
Constitution is an evolving document with a measure of permanence that allows
for it to be modified if required, as it has been seventeen times since the
original ten amendments were accepted. This feature has helped to minimize
efforts by some to enforce their beliefs and values on others especially if
they conflict with the rights of others even if those individuals are in the
minority. This has generally thwarted mob rule since citizens hold the
Constitution in high regard as the Supreme law of the land.
I do not know if Plato
was prescient about class struggle between the rich and the poor because that
actually had existed long before him, but he was correct in recognizing it in
his society. Most cultures always have some type of class structure where a few
individuals at the very top have greater resources or power and make decisions
that affect the rest of society. There are some individuals occupying various
phases of the middle and the great majority of individuals at the bottom of the
pyramid who struggle to make ends meet. Every decade or two, there are economic
and financial cycles that rebalance the equity and this prevents a wholesale
overthrow of the government. The gap
been the haves and have-nots has continued to grow in recent years in our
country and it is possible that within the next twenty years we will see a
shift to higher taxes on the wealthiest Americans and this will ease the burden
on those individuals in the lower economic groups, but then the cycle will
undoubtedly repeat itself; it is not a “dismal cycle” of decay, just a typical
economic adjustment. The solution is greater citizen involvement to insure
fairness and equity. This will minimize the impetus to rebel because citizens
will trust that their voices and concerns are being heard.
Very thoughtful essay, Don, and at 665 words well beyond the call of duty. They're good words, though, I wouldn't know which ones to tell you to leave out.
ReplyDeleteBut (I can imagine a scoffer saying), what if "greater citizen involvement" elects a populist demagogue? I think I know the answer: more involvement, more democracy, better discourse. Would that include the kind of "revolution" Bernie's been calling for? Or is he also just talking about an "adjustment"?