Up@dawn 2.0

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Alden Kelley Section 9 Post 3 of 3

Philosophy within Batman

Batman and Philosophy

What separates Batman from other superheroes is the fact that he is human and wasn't bitten by a spider, birthed from aliens, or was exposed to radioactivity. Since Batman is a self made human hero he is constantly struggling with social, psychological, and philosophical questions. The movies, animated series and comics are filled with Batman having to make tough decisions and how this affects him psychologically. An example is in The Dark Knight when he has to make the tough decision to save either Harvey Dent or his love, Rachel Dawes. 
Check out the scene as Batman first finds out that he has to make this tough decision.


If this was any other "superhero," they probably would have been able to save both of them and walk away with a nice happy ending, but not for Batman. He decided to save Harvey because he believed that Harvey was the light at the end of the dark tunnel of Gotham. He thought that if Gotham had the strong DA that Harvey was that maybe Gotham wouldn't need a Batman anymore, boy was he wrong. Little did he know at that time that by saving Harvey he would be creating another villain. Now he has got to live with letting his love die and instead of giving Gotham what they needed, creating another villain. Arp and White, two of the editors for the book "Batman and Philosophy," frame Batman's ethical dilemmas in three ways.

Is Batman a deontologist? That is, does he follow an ethic that must be universally true for all people at all times no matter the consequences? Is Batman a utilitarian, in that he struggles to achieve the best possible outcome for the most well-being? Or is Batman a virtue ethicist who makes moral decisions based on his own capabilities in the face of his ethical dilemmas? (Why, for example, doesn't Batman just kill the Joker? Is it right that he keeps picking up orphan boys and training them to fight crime at his side?)
I believe in the decision Batman made between Harvey and Rachel, he was leaning towards a utilitarian solution, because in his mind by saving Harvey he was ultimately giving Gotham hope, leading to the most well-being. The story of Batman, no matter how its portrayed, is filled with all kinds of philosophical ideas and problems. Maybe this is why I have always enjoyed Batman and found him to be my personal favorite hero. Here is a little interview that Ideas did questioning the two editors of "Batman and Philosophy" and I thought it was interesting.
IDEAS: What is it about Batman, more than say Superman, that's relevant to philosophy?
WHITE: Because he doesn't have powers, Batman faces more limitations, and limitations force decisions, many of which will be ethical, or more broadly philosophical, in nature. He can't always save everyone, so who to save? How far does he have to push himself for his mission? Superman rarely confronts these issues, because he is so strong and so fast.
IDEAS: We often think of ethics as having to be grounded in some idea of God, but we don't see that with Batman.
ARP: In Batman's universe there is no God. We have to make our meaning, make our own way. Batman becomes the new god, the superhuman that steps up to the plate and metes out justice the way in which God would.
IDEAS: Do you think the realism of the new films helps or hinders thinking about Batman philosophically?
WHITE: I think it definitely helps. This is not the shiny, happy Batman that Adam West portrayed, which was consistent with the comics at the time, or even the more serious Batman that Michael Keaton played. This is how we imagine Batman would be if he were real, given all that he's gone through. This makes him more believable, more realistic, more human. And human beings, more than shiny caricatures, face philosophical dilemmas.
IDEAS: Is Batman a relativist or does he believe in some kind of universal ethic?
ARP: Yes, he believes in some kind of universal ethics, no doubt. Batman thinks there's an objective reality no matter what the situation is. When all is said and done he is still an American superhero, and in that sense he can be black and white. Almost all superheroes are going to be black-and-white objectivists. I can't think of any superhero who champions relativism.
IDEAS: Doesn't this make Batman come across as authoritarian?
WHITE: Batman believes wholeheartedly in his mission, but it's his mission alone, and he very hesitantly involves other people in it. I think he knows his ideas of right and wrong may seem fairly extreme, but he's not asking anybody else to believe in them.
IDEAS: The image of the young Bruce Wayne looking over his dead parents really defines the book. How does someone go from that to dressing like a giant bat?
WHITE: There are children who tragically lose their parents each day, but young Bruce obviously took it differently than most. It stole his innocence and steered him toward devoting his life to helping make sure others don't face the same tragedy he did.
IDEAS: Why does it often take a comic book or movie to get the general public to think about philosophy?
WHITE: Comic books, and quality pop culture in general, are simply more approachable, and lead us to consider philosophical questions without realizing it. Bill Irwin [series editor of the Blackwell Popular Culture and Philosophy books] uses the spoonful-of-sugar analogy: If you make philosophy fun, and use an entry point they are familiar with, they may find out they like it, and then read some "real" philosophy.
IDEAS: Do some scholars see this kind of thing as silly?
ARP: Sure. People think it's just a moneymaker or a way to get your name on something. But I don't think there's anything wrong with that. At root we are trying to bring philosophy to people and bring people to philosophy.
IDEAS: Is there anything we can really learn from Batman, a fictional hero, about making our own choices?
WHITE: I see in Batman a great example of devotion and self-sacrifice that can counter the "do what feels good" advice you get in so many self-help books and talk shows. I'm not saying we should all put on a costume and fight crime, but I think we can all learn from Batman's determination to do what he feels is right, even if it doesn't always make him happy. Sometimes doing what's right is more important than doing what feels good.

1 comment:

  1. But maybe Aristotle and the Greeks were right: doing the right thing feels good and ultimately coincides with perfect virtue and (therefore) happiness.

    Anyway, I'm glad we don't all have to put on silly pajama costumes and hide our true identities in order to live well.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.