Diogenes of Apollonia
Diogenes of Apollonia was alive
between 450 BCE and 400 BCE, though the specific dates are unknown, and was one
of the last pre-Socratic philosophers, if not the very last. Originally from either
the Cretan city of Apollonia or the Milesian colony of Apollonia, Diogenes’s
exact origins are unknown, though he eventually found his way to Athens before
being driven out for accusations of being an atheist.
Diogenes is responsible for several
written works, from many different medical entries to his famous On Nature, where he talks about his
belief in substance monism as we know it today. Substance monists believe that
all things are truly different forms of the same thing, like how ice is another
form of water.
He found his foundational beliefs
as a philosopher in the ideas of Anaximenes of Miletus, the atomist who claimed
that all things were air. Diogenes, too, claimed that all things are forms of
air because only things that are alike can affect one another, and because of
observations he knew that things do in
fact interact. According to him, air is the breath of life that allows all
things to occur, the basic element for everything. He also believed that air
was intelligent, and that the soul was air.
While this may seem crazy today,
Diogenes was not actually very far off from the truth. Hydrogen atoms, rather
than the air, make up nearly all normal matter in the universe, and all other
atoms form from the fusion of hydrogen in the cores of stars. Though the universe
is also composed of dark matter and different forms of energy, all matter that
humankind has interacted with thus far has evolved from one thing, the hydrogen
atom. Hydrogen, like Diogenes’s idea of air, is essential to all life.
He focused on the physics of the
world, rather than the ethics of humanity. For the centuries following
Diogenes, physical philosophy fell to the shadow of the Socratic age of
philosophy, meaning that the closest modern-day comparison to Diogenes would
not actually be a common-era philosopher, but instead something of a
theoretical physicist. Diogenes focused on the scientific areas of matter (as
we now call it) and the universe, similar to scientists like Stephen Hawking
and Albert Einstein. Although Diogenes later went on to teaching rhetoric and
Greek politics, his truest lasting impact is on the within the sciences.
In addition to his theories on air,
Diogenes of Apollonia also contributed to the medical industry with his work on
vascular anatomy. Diogenes composed a relatively accurate layout of blood
vessels in humans. He thought that some vessels were filled with air, the
substance he found so fundamental to everything, and that others were filled
with blood, and that death was found only when all air left the body. Though
this was eventually proven untrue, his ideas of the structure and function of
the human vascular system was crucial to later scientists who furthered his
ideas and ultimately revolutionized the medical field.
Diogenes of Apollonia was the last
of a long line of pre-Socratic philosophers and further popularized substance
monism. A physicist at heart, he did not ask what is good? or what is bad?
but merely what is? He found his
answer in air, and although we now know this is wrong, he was on the right
track to our current, modern understanding of our universe.
Quiz
1. Why
was Diogenes driven out of Athens?
2. What
was Diogenes of Apollonia’s most famous writing?
3. What
did Diogenes believe to be the substance that composed everything, including
life and intelligence?
4. To
which medical field did Diogenes contribute?
Discussion
1. Do
you think that Diogenes was completely wrong in his position on substance monism,
or do you think there is some truth to what he believed?
2. Do
you find the pre-Socratic philosophers, such as Diogenes of Apollonia, or the
Socratic philosophers to be more fun to learn about?
This was a great presentation, Samual. There are several quite interesting facts about Diogenes of Apollonia. I'm a bit surprised he isn't more known, but I guess it isn't easy to one-up the more bizzare behavior of his counterpart. I appreciated your attempt to somewhat vindicate Diogenes' substance monism in light of what we now know about the fundamental importance of hydrogen. As with some other Pre-Socratic philosophers, Diogenes' ideas aren't as ridiculous as they may seem at first. I might push you a bit to consider what Diogenes' philosophical merit would be if his speculation turned out to be farther from the mark. Is there anything redeemable about his method, his kind of inquiry? Another thing I appreciated was your comparison of Pre-Socratic and Post-Socractic philosophies. Although the demarcation between these two can be a bit too simple (we've talked about how Pre-Socratic philosophers weren't limited to talk about what makes up the world), it is helpful to identify some overall shifts in emphasis. Well done!
ReplyDelete