Today we spoke about Nehemas' outlook
on friendship. Our group agreed that friendships are very vital to
our existence. Naturally, we hold a very large attachment to the
relationships that we have with people around us. But, when those
relationships reach a certain level of internal significance, they
transcend into something different. Something heavier.
When friendships are terminated, we all
agreed that the “it's not you it's me” / “don't take this
personal” are all just ways to avoid the sincerity of the
situation, relationships are terminated based on the dissatisfaction
of one of the members of the relationship.
We all feel like social networking has
turned friendships into just flatlined “interactions”.
Furthermore, we discussed how
interactions with people through other means than direct
conversation, can cause us not to catch the authenticity of a
conversation. When just communicating through text, either cellular
or social networking, we lack the ability of body language, vocal
inflection, etc. etc., and these things are vital in understanding
one's personal message.
We agreed that friendships are vital,
given that humans strive for acceptance, our interactions with
friends build our character.
But we came to a question, where do our
friendships develop into an overall change of character?
Because of how influenced we are by our
social groups.
And where does it become wrong?
Is it wrong?
We discussed that conformity is
inevitable, and that it's okay, as long as we do keep our perception
of own identity.
We discussed the expectations that
people set to friendships, and that the timespan of friendships can
not really be determined. Therefore, it is more plausible to “go
with the flow”.
“Friendships are like cotton
t-shirts, wash them with hot water, and they'll shrink.” - Jacob.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.