tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2619743764213415433.post1238043029324800125..comments2023-11-03T07:07:55.456-05:00Comments on CoPhilosophy: Kant and ReasonPhilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02115141650963300011noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2619743764213415433.post-15245169275687380692016-10-27T10:35:51.536-05:002016-10-27T10:35:51.536-05:00I agree with Jordan, but in a different way. Not o...I agree with Jordan, but in a different way. Not only is it intentions, but some of the outcome factors in as well. For example, Hitler may have claimed that he had good intentions of rising his country out of a pit of despair. Does that make what he did, i.e. starting the Holocaust, good simply because he meant well? I feel that some of the outcome must be factored in to see the true good of any one thing.Kaite Berryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01456984746987114560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2619743764213415433.post-41198373558432377282016-10-19T21:34:58.675-05:002016-10-19T21:34:58.675-05:00(H1) I don't think everything is tainted by th...(H1) I don't think everything is tainted by the possibility of being something bad, that would take the fun out of most things. I believe intentions are what separates something good from something bad, not that the thing itself is inherently bad because it may hold the possibility of being used as such.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com