Communication has played a large factor in the way humans
have learned and understood each other since the birth of our species. As we
evolved, our ways of communicating have also evolved. We have made great
advances in communication technologies, allowing us to communicate even quicker
than previous methods allowed. As we move through the age of information, we
have grown used to technologies such as the internet and the many ways to
connect to it. We can use cell phones and portable computers to connect to the
Web from almost anywhere. In fact, over the past decade the internet seems to
have developed its own community and culture. Young and older people have
started integrating this culture into their daily lives to such a point that we
start to blur real life and cyber space. Everything you do, everywhere you go
and every personal event you experience will most likely involve the internet
in some form or another. And by default, when we have such an integration of
communities and cultures, we begin to see ideas and information get passed
around. The internet enables this passing of information to be extremely quick
compared to years ago when we only had the radio and rotary telephones.
Nowadays, information can reach millions of people in a matter of seconds,
because of this new swiftness in communication, new trends and forms come and
go quickly. A recent example is internet memes. As popular as memes have become
over the past decade, I’d like to pursue the idea that memes could potentially
be a new form of communication. We should consider memes more seriously,
especially linguistically. How complex can memes get and what potential impact
do they have on us in the internet landscape and in real life?
I’d like
to go over the history of the term and the beginnings of the idea. The Oxford
Dictionary defines memes as, “an element of a culture or system of behavior
passed from one individual to another by imitation or other non-genetic means.”
In short, memes are the passing down and replication of ideas using our senses
instead of through reproduction. This term was coined in 1976 by Richard
Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist, in his book, The Selfish Gene. The reason
he introduced the term “meme” was because it sounded like “gene”, which he then
went on to relate the two terms on a much deeper level. Dawkins is saying that
in genetics, DNA is the replicating entity that, “prevails on our own planet”.
He goes on to say at this point in our evolutionary line, we have unconsciously
created a new replicator for cultural and non-genetic information, the meme
(Dawkins 206). Unfortunately, Dawkins would only coin the term speculatively
and without much more explanation. It wasn’t until 1985 when Douglas Hofstadter
published his book Metamagical Themas, and introduced the term, “Memeticist”.
The term was to be used analogously to the word geneticist. Hofstadter’s book
would go on to be widely influential and start the modern memetics movement.
Because of Dawkins’ book, The Selfish Gene, memeticists have concluded that
memes are essentially metaphorical viruses implanted in one’s mind by imitation
or cultural transmission. And like viruses, memes adapt to their hosts way of
thinking and personality.
Based on
the brief history and light explanation of the terms meme and memetics, you
might be thinking, “how does this relate to internet memes?” Well, if we’re
going by the definition in the Oxford Dictionary then memes are broader than
the humorous pictures and captions you see on your Facebook page. In fact, you
could say that all aspects of human culture can be considered a meme. It would
take multiple novel length works to be able to go over even just a fraction of
just how broad and complex memes can be. Some would suggest that memes are not
complex at all and are just quick bits of entertainment and some would go so
far to say that memes simplify complex issues to a laughable point, I disagree.
There are many elements to memes that add to their complexity and these ideas
should be investigated.
For those that still might be having trouble understanding
memes, I’d like to make a comparison to a closely related concept that is used
mainly for literature. It is common for tropes and memes to be related and
compared because of their similarities. A writer from Knowyourmeme.com, opspe
states that, "Tropes are frequently used in communication alongside memes,
but there is an important difference. Memes are units of cultural expression,
whereas tropes generally refer to literary devices or clichés. In a way, tropes
tend to be much more general ideas than memes; tropes may form the style of a
language, while memes are the objects of language."
When communicating, a person
may draw upon or refer to tropes, while incorporating specific memes.
To me, this comparison is perfect because it gives a sort of
analogy to the idea of memes while also helping to explain their place in human
language. We can play around with memes in many different forms and languages,
but tropes set in stone the way a language or literary concept flows. So, while
memes may not be a new literary device, they are an add-on or element that can
make light of or simplify difficult concepts in a piece of literature. Some
would disagree with this idea, Aneeq Ejaz, a writer from Quillete.com considers
memes to be the return of the fable in many ways. He states that, “Just like
fables, memes are community-driven, anonymously produced and open to
modification.” I agree completely with this statement, but I don’t consider
memes to be anywhere near fables. Fables typically include animals,
supernatural elements and usually have a moral to teach, memes do not work hard
enough to include any of this. You could argue that some memes might have
animals in the pictures and others might have a moral theme attached to them,
but memes are not short stories, they are cultural ideas in small units. Fables
are also included in the realm of myth and legend, which again, you could argue
that certain memes have gained the status of legend or myth. I would consider
this classification to be idolization or iconic instead of legendary or mythic.
Memes do not become popular on belief or faith in them, they become popular
based on how easily related, replicated or imitated they become.
What I want to do is glean light on the process by which
memes become popular. Like any social trend or fad, meme creators and consumers
have ideas that constantly evolve. And just like the evolutionary cycle that a
species might go through, memes do the same. Memes either die out or they
evolve and change slightly to match their environment, they can adapt to the
social landscape and consumer opinions. If we combine these two ideas then
maybe we can better understand the complexities of how we interact with memes
on a conscience and subconscious level. Internet memes are classified as
viruses and can be spread easily over the internet in a replicating and
infectious manner. When I say, memes spread virally, I mean that they spread to
multiple hosts without changing form drastically. This factor combined with the
evolutionary cycle of memes allows me to conclude that there is a strong
possibility that they are a new form of communication. The rapid spreading of
memes across the world can be compared to the rapid spreading of languages
throughout ancient civilizations. And, for those who would not completely
agree, maybe they could agree that memes are just a new element or accession to
our modern forms of communication. Maybe memes enhance our ability to exchange
ideas on a broader level but in a viral way. It’s common nowadays for things to
go viral on the internet, memes are not an exception.
"we start to blur real life and cyber space" - you know the cure for that? Get a dog, and take him outside first thing every morning. While you're out there, DON'T look at your phone. Just look around, sniff the air, think some fresh morning thoughts and sip your coffee. Then, measure the rest of your day against THAT standard of reality. You won't get blurry.
ReplyDelete"how we interact with memes on a conscience and subconscious level" - I know you meant "conscious," but maybe that's a useful slip if it suggests a question about whether conscience should govern our participation in meme-spreading. If we're involved enough in the process of replicating these units of cultural meaning to be responsible for them, what ethical issues arise when we re-post or re-tweet a meme? Or are memes strictly SELF-replicators? Are we passive conduits of memes, or deployers of memes? Can we engineer memes in constructive ways, to promote good ideas and combat bad ones?
Do you happen to know what Dawkins thinks about the way his meme-idea has mutated?
I haven't exactly looked into what Dawkins thinks about his idea at this point, but I'm sure he is more or less at the same position he was when he first wrote about it. He's kind of a stubborn guy. The first question you asked, I've actually put together a presentation for my global politics class last semester that discusses this exact notion. In the 2008 presidential election to be specific, memes actually had quite a bit to do with how the polls ended. The same can be said with the 2016 election too, the intent this time around was more malicious though. So yes I would say that we definitely can engineer them in certain ways, it just depends on the creators aim.
DeleteI think it'd be interesting to see you talk about where we draw the line for what's okay to be a meme. Recently August Ames committed suicide because she was getting made fun of on the internet. At what point is it time to step back and say a meme is bullying and could be harmful. I've seen plenty of meme videos when it's a cute start then someone gets their brains bashed in-leaked snuff videos-and its awful. Is it okay to make those things seem funny or is it sadistic? Personally I don't think we should be able to use a meme as an excuse to show viscous videos or repeatedly bully someone.
ReplyDelete