The work of Karl Marx, as both a
philosopher and revolutionary, provides a notable analysis of modernity on multiple
aspects. He is most famous for his fiery attacks on capitalism, however, Marx
is also known for his sincere cultural and philosophic reasoning. The main
question which should be considered about Marx’s work, is whether or not his
works can be read in a different way than his expressed revolutionary purpose? The
work of Marx can be classified into two periods: the young idealist,
philosophical Marx; and the mature, materialist, and scientific Marx.
Regardless of the two periods, all of Marx’s work fluctuates between a focus on
the transformation of consciousness, and an insistence on the greater
importance of material conditions for the formation of consciousness. A
treatment for this tension is crucial to the interpretation of Marxism or Marx
himself. Philosophy is based on its practical and revolutionary character, or “praxis,”
claimed Marx, considering the cognizable direction of history. On the subject
matter of practical politics, there was much debate among Marx and his
followers on the proper scope and nature of the intellectual leadership of
workers’ parties, the uncertainty of the transformation from capitalism to
socialism, and the requirement that would involve a revolutionary transformation
of state structures. These issues can be seen communicated in a number of forms
from his treatments of Hegel, to his doctrine of historical materialism, and
even his teachings in economics.
When considering Marx’s early
writings, there are four which tend to stand out the most. “Contribution to a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,
Introduction,” and “On the Jewish
Question,” were written in 1843 and were later published in the Deutsch-Französische
Jahrbücher. However, some of Marx’s work would remain unpublished in his lifetime
such as “The Economic and Philosophical
Manuscripts,” which was written in Paris 1844, and “Theses on Feuerbach’ in 1845.
Shortly after “The German Ideology” was unpublished, which was written with Engels in 1845, we can see that Marx was in
the early stages of expanding his theory of history. Soon after, Marx and
Engels jointly co-wrote “The Communist
Manifesto,” which is considered Marx’s most renowned work, and insight to
his thought. After it was published Marx returned to Germany from exile excited
to participate in the revolution of 1848. When the revolution failed, Marx
moved to London where he concentrated on the study of economics and would
produce his “Contribution to a Critique
of Political Economy” in 1859. This is most notable for its preface, in
which Marx provides a description of ‘the guiding principles’ of his thought,
which a vast number of interpretations on historical materialism are based.
Marx’s main work in the field of economics is without a doubt, “Capital” - the first volume being published in 1867, and
volume three later in 1894. He also wrote the late pamphlet “Critique of the Gotha Programme” in
1875 and is seen as a key insight for his opinions on the organization and
nature of communist society.
Link to part 1:
http://cophilosophy.blogspot.com/2017/12/karl-marx-philosopher-and-revolutionary.html#comments
Sources:
http://thegreatthinkers.org/marx/introduction/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/#1
http://www.history.com/topics/karl-marx
Comments:
https://cophilosophy.blogspot.com/2017/12/procrastination-and-motivation-or-lack_12.html?showComment=1513116772256#c6488632464154957344
https://cophilosophy.blogspot.com/2017/12/10-nietzche-and-human-suffering_12.html?showComment=1513117202237#c7609880803252366747
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.