Contact is the only way
in which you learn about something. Someone must tell you about, or show you
something in order for you to become familiar with it. Whether it be from a book,
documentary, a seminar, or other methods, you don’t know something until it is
presented to you, and typically it is conveyed in a certain light. Many people
form opinions based on how those around them react to a topic and emotions.
David Hume discusses how morals stem from this same type of situation.
David Hume believed that
morals stem from your emotions and not through a rational thought process. Hume
said, “It is not reason which is the guide of life, but custom.” That how you
respond to something tends to stem from how others have responded to the same
or similar events. He said that there are specifically three characters that
play into his idea. These characters consist of the agent, the receiver, and
the spectator. Each character receives the action in different ways and is
influenced accordingly. This theory was developed based on other theories of
earlier philosophers. In this dynamic the agent is the person who performs the
action in question, the receiver is the person who is impacted by the action,
and the spectator is whoever observes this action. The agent is the one who
sets the scenario by performing either a malicious or kind-hearted act. The receiver
then feels either hurt or happy based on this action, which impacts how the spectator
perceives the action.
Hume’s theory suggests
that two attributes control all actions. Either a virtuous attribute or a
vicious attribute contribute to the action performed by the agent. The
difference between the two is what causes the receiver to either feel
positively or negatively. Which then cause the spectator to sympathize and feel
as the receiver does. Hume expresses that these attributes are natural, meaning
you either have them or you don’t. In contrast, there are other attributes that
he considers artificial, meaning they are developed by others impact. He states
that there are four types that all attributes fall into, including those useful
to others, those useful to oneself, those that are liked by others, and those
that are liked by oneself.
David Hume’s theory on
morals was probably impacted by his childhood. Hume was raised by his mother
after his father died when Hume was two. However, Hume did have an older
brother who he went with to Edinburgh University. Hume began studies at
Edinburgh around the age of ten, studying many subjects including philosophy. Hume
became exposed to many ideas at an extremely impressionable time of his life which
explains his devotion to knowledge. Which made him into the man who questioned morals
and how they should be viewed. These views also reflect in his religious views.
David Hume said, “A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.”
Source: http://www.iep.utm.edu/hume/#H7
Source: http://www.iep.utm.edu/hume/#H7
"Contact is the only way in which you learn about something. Someone must tell you about, or show you something in order for you to become familiar with it." Can't you learn about things directly, using your own perceptions and reasoning? Empiricists like Hume say we must begin with our own experience, not someone else's. But of course it's true that Hume also says our judgments of value do tend to reflect the customs and habits of others, and that there's nothing wrong with that - so long as they accord with your own experience.
ReplyDeleteYour sources?
I love that final quote, "A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence," but if we did that then we our systems would all collapse! It is exceedingly difficult to be convinced that someone committed a crime "beyond a reasonable doubt," and yet we convict people of criminal acts more in this country than in any other country in the world (sorry, communist China and lawless Russia, this one's ours)!
ReplyDeleteI believe electricity exists not because my electronics work, but because I'm taught about electricity. The truth is that few people are capable of weighing the evidence presented to them, because much of that evidence requires a specialized background. So should we have a tentative belief in electricity, because something makes our lights come on and it might be electricity or anything else that we don't understand powering the lights? Or should we believe firmly in electricity because someone who has spent years studying the physical sciences tells us that there is such a thing as electricity?