When
William James died in 1910, he had read, studied, and reflected on the major
philosophers who had preceded him or were his contemporaries. He added to their
foundation of thoughts expressed as best they could in their words and
synthesized them into his own thoughts and words. Over one hundred years later
with today’s knowledge and experience, how would his thoughts have evolved?
Consider
what he knew that Plato and Aristotle did not -- Newton’s law of universal
gravitation, Roemer’s estimate of the speed of light, Einstein’s theory of
relativity, and what he did not know -- the age of the universe, black holes,
subatomic particles, and innumerable galaxies and solar systems. He was unable
to listen to or read about the research and reports of Carl Sagan or Neil
deGrasse Tyson as they explained the latest images and findings on the Cosmos.
James
knew of the discovery of Neanderthal fossils in Germany and dinosaur bones in
the Rocky Mountain region, but he would not have learned about Lucy’s remains
in Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania which further challenged the biblical, six
thousand years since creation, theory. But he would have understood human
nature’s desire to hold onto that old belief as well as others, even today and to try to deny or modify new knowledge, rather than discard the old knowledge
because its origin is based on the “common sense” that existed from the earliest
humans’s thoughts on their origin.
James acknowledged that the “pluralistic view,
of a world of additive constitution, is one that pragmatism is unable to rule
out from serious consideration. But this view leads one to the farther
hypothesis that the actual world, instead of being complete ‘eternally,’ as the
monists assure us, may be eternally incomplete, and at all time subject to
addition or liable to loss.”[1]
Would he consider that one day we will discover that the universe will cease to
expand and will begin to contract and that all matter will coalesce into one
gigantic black hole and once everything is located at a central point, it will
explode into the nth “Big Bang” and a new cycle of universal expansion will
begin again? Perhaps!
"James acknowledged that the “pluralistic view, of a world of additive constitution, is one that pragmatism is unable to rule out from serious consideration." And indeed, he celebrates the pluralistic and additive nature of existence as the only known sort of world in which human contributions count, make a difference, in a significant way. And he both celebrates and challenges "common sense" as the tendency to resist the full extent of our possible contributions.
ReplyDeleteHe'd be a Sagan/Tyson fan, for sure!