(H3) Can you
have a favorite philosopher without compromising your critical independence
from him/her? I think you can have a favorite philosopher without adopting
their ideas. There are plenty of philosophers that I respect, but with whom I
disagree. I might like their ideas over one topic, but find another of their
conclusions odd or inaccurate. I also might like their philosophy, but hate
their delivery, which makes a huge difference in the perception and reception of
their ideas, or vice versa. Also, just because I like the way a person's mind
works and the conclusions they draw, doesn't mean I change my philosophy to
mirror theirs. Having a firm grasp on what you believe can allow you to support
a philosopher without adopting their ideas. While imitation is the sincerest form
of flattery, adhering to one’s own independence and philosophy is even more
admirable. Being able to understand and relate to someone else’s ideas and then
use that to strengthen your own ideas, is a sign of true comprehension. Appreciation
does not equate to dependence. I can appreciate a style of artwork, like
minimalism or pop art, and still maintain my own style and voice. I can
appreciate a certain type or genre of music and still have a favorite genre
other than that previous type. The point is that having a favorite philosopher
does not prohibit you from liking other philosophers and having your own ideas.
Much like a favorite teacher in school, just because you like the way they
teach or believe does not mean you are restricted to only thinking the way they
think. We are each our own person, with our own philosophies. Our philosophies
may change over time, based our experiences and accumulated knowledge, but they
will remain unique to that person.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.