I enjoy noticing the little
things that are often left out of general synopsizes of philosophers. My
presentation on Pythagoras the mystic is an excellent example of that. When
reading about Locke, his ideas of the state of nature, the blank slate, and thoughts
on reason. Other, far more interesting parts of his philosophy often fall to
the wayside, and aren't mentioned.
Locke excluded women and the poor
from the rights of citizenship. He states that military commanders do have
power over the lives of their soldiers, but they don't have power over their
soldiers money; so a fine would be impermissible, but a beating or execution
would be perfectly ok. At the same time, taxation is considered necessary.
Locke believed that there should be freedom of religion, except when a religion
was a threat to the public order; therefore atheists and Catholics were
therefore not permitted. Locke wanted freedom of religion within the protestant
context. During war between nations, enemies taken hostage can become slaves; a
notion that modern members of democracies balk at. Locke also thought very
highly of property, making it the foundation of his government: “The great and
chief end of men uniting into commonwealths, and putting themselves under
government, is the preservation of their property.” Colonial Americans
rebelling against taxation makes a lot more sense when perceived from this
Lockian standpoint.
As a clever and influential
philosopher, Locke and his writing have influenced world history. The American
declaration of independence and Constitution give evidence of that. Many of his
ideas and concepts were useful and groundbreaking, and he was the founder of
philosophical liberalism and empiricism. These great ideals stand out from his
smaller and more destructive ones.
I also noticed these smaller aspects of Locke and it made me concentrate on them more so than the big picture of his influences. I am glad I am not the only one.
ReplyDelete