The final question I have for Pyrrho is based on his quality
of life, and how he would attain happiness. What is the reason for living? I
feel that his answer would be ambiguous in many ways. It depends on his idea of
happiness as well. It is possible that one would never be happy because you
never know anything. It is human nature to be curious about how things work.
History always shows that people have competed to figure something out first,
or be the first to discover something new entirely. This leads us to believe
that Pyrrho’s philosophy goes against the entire human nature. But this theory
is assuming that Pyrrho’s idea of happiness is based on knowledge. This is most
likely the wrong idea to use since his theory was based on doubting all things.
It is possible Pyrrho found happiness in NOT knowing anything. If this were the
case, then Pyrrho developed the perfect philosophy for himself. He crafted a
way of thinking to where it would be impossible for him to ever know anything,
thus creating a sense of constant happiness. This is also merely guesswork
about his idea of happiness. Perhaps he found happiness by merely existing?
However, this seems a highly unlikely answer since he would most likely doubt
his own existence. If he doubts his existence, then he technically doubts his
happiness. If you doubt your happiness, then how can you be happy? Maybe Pyrrho
found a new level of happiness where one person simply finds happiness in a way
that can’t be explained for any other human. If it worked for Pyrrho then why
should he have to explain his methods? The philosophy is deemed successful if
the person using it likes the way their life is going. Pyrrho was probably
happy the way he lived, and we can’t complain too much about him since he did
introduce the idea of skepticism. Even if it was one of the most extreme cases
there could have possibly been. Pyrrho made his own style of living. The only
reason I can think of as to why somebody would do this is to be happy. So,
WHATEVER Pyrrho’s reason for creating this philosophy doesn’t matter, it gave
him happiness and he shared the viewpoint in an attempt to make other people
happy. There are still skeptics today although not as extreme. But maybe that
IS the point of living, to find the perfect way of thinking to bring yourself
happiness. No two people are the same, so no two viewpoints are the same.
"maybe that IS the point of living, to find the perfect way of thinking to bring yourself happiness." - better yet, to bring yourself and others the possibility of happiness.
ReplyDelete