-
The Search for Knowledge and the True Nature of Reality -
A Quick Warning: This writing is
the musing of a blank-slate ape. I harbor no bad feelings for any group of
people and am on the same intellectual journey as all of you, though mine may
be a bit more harebrained. What I say, I don't hold onto with any aggressive
belief (at least not until I've figured things out a tad more). I may speak
about topics that offend you or seem like an attack on your personal beliefs,
which is certainly not my intention! This writing is a bit of performance art
on my part. The art being that it is a picture into my own cognition; this is
my own, slightly more researched and put together, stream of consciousness.
Excuse my immaturity of thought and semi-didactic tone but this is a big- time
soapbox and I can't refuse a good opportunity to vomit thoughts all over smart people!
Post 1
The pursuit of gaining knowledge is, for
most people, a respectable and noble pursuit. Many college students start off
with the mentality of wanting to learn as much as they can as humans (I chose
this topic because it’s typically in the minds of idealistic college students).
Unfortunately, gaining procedural knowledge can be very difficult and
exhausting. Other than reading, which takes lots of time, a human concerned
with intellectual growth must practice conceptualization of complex problems
and topics. The interstices within everything that surrounds us are so numerous
that it would be impossible for a person to learn everything about everything,
especially when humans are creating new ‘things’ at an ever-increasing rate.
Even learning a small percentage of what there is to know can be, and often is,
stressful. I believe the overwhelming amount of data shoved in our faces causes
us to take a metaphorical ‘time out’. What I mean by this is that we tend to
look at the details, get over-stimulated and then attempt to create a simpler
understanding of the universe. This little and most likely grotesquely naïve
elaboration will center on the ways in which we try to understand our inherited
environment and how we try to deceiver the true nature of reality.
From the beginning of history, man has
concentrated on the mystical. To me, mysticism is a practice which regards the
undeniably complex and attempts to put a relatively simplistic blanket over it.
Mystics grasp at what is unknown and attempt to make it know through some form
of concentrated thought or meditation. As complex biological structures, humans
feel. We feel the good, the bad and the downright mystical. These feelings are
a phenomenon which undeniably happen and, to most, would seem of a veritable
importance; almost as if there were no barrier between the analytical mind and
the fabric of reality itself. This belief that the mind and the universe are
connected through some enigmatic structure is the very basis of mysticism, most
commonly found in religion.
Religion is an extremely convenient tool
for the confused. Let’s face it, the world is a very confusing place. Certain
deist religions take what is thoroughly unthinkable and forces it into the
simplest model possible. The religion nearest to me, Christianity, assumes the
absolute existence of a singular creator who watches over every living being
(but gives extra special attention to humans). Growing up as a Christian, I
found it quite nice to have a cognizant security blanket who seemingly answered
all of my questions and who took care of all of my problems. Because of my own
experience, I understand where Christians come from in their search for deeper
knowledge and truth. I use the example of Christianity only because it is
something I know a lot about and that it is the predominant religion of the
world (soon to be usurped by Islam).
There
are many who reject orthodox religion, yet fully respect the reality of the
mystical. This pseudo-religion seems to not have a common name, yet is clearly
based on a loose form dogmatism, as oxymoronic as it sounds! This form of
mysticism focuses on energies which are invisible and undetectable. Hinduism
expounds upon this idea in its concept of ‘Shakti’. In the Hindu religion,
Shakti is a primordial cosmic energy which acts as a driving force for
complexification and creativity in the universe embodied by a goddess. This is
the key difference between the atheistic religions and the theistic religions.
The belief in a creative energy is the same, yet the strict belief that there
must be a deity behind it is the difference. Both are yogic practices in which
the unity of the mind and body are essential for the liberation of the soul
from the material world. Yoga intrigues me and I am still looking into it
further. I only do yoga and meditate to achieve a state of mental stability and
centeredness however. Personally, the ultimately non-human truth involved is
still up in the air. I fear that the ‘study’ of energies or concentrations of
energies in the body (chakras) are another form of fantasy.
============================================================================================
Post 2
The next obvious human attempt at gaining
knowledge is the pursuit of scientific advancement. The goal of increasing
scientific knowledge has seemed to be existent throughout history (some periods
being more explosive than others); this journey starts at the creation of the
first tools, all the way to advanced space exploration and global
computerization. It would seem as though this advancement simply benefits the
lives of mankind. This is true for technology. As technology is a byproduct of
science, it is secondary to the goal of obtaining pure, unadulterated
information. This being said, computerization has allowed for an overall
increase in global awareness amongst our global society. This is certainly
important in the immediate time-frame of the planet earth, yet the fundamental
laws of nature involved with creating this computerization have been known for
a quite a long time. Once again, technology is just the application of what is
already largely known; creating tools for humans is the engineer’s job! To me,
the avant garde of our society are the scientific theorists.
The end goal of the pursuit of knowledge
through rigorous scientific study is one with Aristotelian roots. Aristotle’s
ideal pathway for attaining gnosis was bound by what humans can truly know.
That is, why theorize on what is clearly unattainable when it may very well end
in complete delusion? This view seems like the safest route if one is trying
not to be incorrect about the true nature of reality. In this mind set, if an
idea has no explicit and non-refutable evidence, it must be labeled as unknown.
This rigor will make sure that we humans don’t outrun where we really are in
our philosophical journey. This is the curse of the ‘armchair philosopher’.
This common figure attempts to gain knowledge on a cosmic scale through
analytical thought and experience. The fundamental flaw with this way of
grasping at gnosis is that there is no fact checking structure involved. The
product of this sort of behavior is seen in our society on a grandiose scale;
its manifestation being the wide-spread acceptance of religion or any form of
mysticism as undeniable truth. This is why I only rely on science and
mathematics as structures of relative truth; these interconnected studies are
the only ones that have explicit evidence in that without them, our reality
could not exist. All other human aspects fall underneath the metaphorical
blanket of pure mathematics as elements of chaotic, self-consistent structures
which may or may not have meaning (which we assumedly will never truly know
from an Aristotelian view).
Scientific theorists attempt to chart the
nature of reality. This seems like a nearly impossible task, and it often is!
Many theories in physics find their home in mathematical consistency rather
than their experimental verification. This is the nature of modern physics;
find what works on paper and try to create an experiment to prove it. Often
times, an experiment is infeasible, therefor the theory will always remain just
that, a theory. The advancements in physics which we can expect in the next few
decades will presumably have no possible experiments (due to the astronomical
energies needed to replicate the conditions of the big-bang), thus making these
theories impossible to disprove. This fact will make scientific and
mathematical advancements become as dogmatic as any form of mysticism. This is
quite disheartening for us physicists, yet biologists, astronomers and chemists
can still have their fun stamp collecting. (All of these studies can be derived
from the laws of physics anyway.)
In seeing this somewhat hopeless search
for truth in the mathematical studies, many intellectuals have decided it best
to study the humanities. In this pursuit, the knowledge seeker studies the
aspects of human interaction, origin (inexorably tied to history) and
personality. I will boil these studies down to sociology, anthropology and
psychology. These would be referred to as ‘soft sciences’ or sciences which
don’t rely on perfect numerical data, but rather depend on simple observation
and analysis. Because we all need to exist within the confines of humanity,
these studies are important to us. In my view, they are only important to us.
There is no evidence that our interaction produces any changes in the universe
other than the physical changes which our bodies (and destructive cultures)
naturally make, therefor the ramification of these studies remain in the air.
None the less, the human studies are extremely interesting and the knowledge
gained from these increase our awareness of our immediate environment and why
people do what they do.
============================================================================================
Post 3
The goal of figuring out the world comes
with a long list of tasks and charges. Those including extensive rigorous
study, dedication to intelligent and rational thought, and retaining the
feeling that ignorance is repulsive. To me, it seems like a life-long devotion
to these life elements is necessary for obtaining one’s greatest potential.
Naturally, said person’s potential is limited by his or her mental hardware
(quickness, memory and simple ability to grasp concepts). This being said, a
gifted intellectual can find him or herself virtually unlimited when it comes
to how far his or her mind can be stretched; for the humans who don’t possess
the traits of genius at a young age, this means a lot of hard work must be done
in order to reach that ‘point’ - or rather level of ability.
For many, this dogged pursuit of
gnosis contributes to their long-term happiness; or so they say. Perhaps it is
simply the arrogance of these intellectuals which spurs them toward this
pursuit. Maybe it’s just a cognitive trait of theirs which makes them possess this
incessant curiosity. Either way, I’m not so sure that the goal of figuring out
the ways of the universe is produced by the want for true happiness. In my own
case, there is a fear of the unknown buried deep within my subconscious. I feel
as though if I don’t understand something, I have not achieved the ‘purpose’ of
the human race – that purpose being to observe and to understand the universe,
down to the smallest interstices. The fact that true understanding of reality
is so far away makes my stomach tie up into knots. This fact makes me realize
my own extreme arrogance. Why must we completely understand everything when the
real goal of it is human egotism? Why must this grand ‘purpose’ be to sweep out
factual knowledge from under the metaphorical rug? The temptation to pursue the
goal of knowing everything, I think, stems from the human realization that we
are the only known machines in the universe who have the capacity to come even
close to this end.
MY FINAL THOUGHTS ON THE SUBJECT
Even if we theoretically have
the ability to figure everything out, should we? Ever since the ‘Pandora’s Box’
of scientific advancement has been opened, mankind has produced more and more ‘stuff’
which Western culture has conditioned us to believe we need. These products,
which are ways of making money from science, are contributing to the
destruction of the Earth. This fact, we can no longer deny. So what is the
grand purpose of knowing every scientific fact when all it does is contribute
back into this poisonous society which we have cultivated in the West (the
science of Environmentalism is simply not enough to reverse the effects of our
culture on the planet while we continue to live as we do). The fact that our
knowledge seeking has brought our planet to the brink of death shows the need
to halt this progress (for the time being of course).
I still believe that our ‘purpose’,
if we must have one, is to completely understand our universe. We are the only
ones who can sense the beauty of it all and a more complete image of our cosmic
environment, in my mind, allows us to fully appreciate that intricate beauty.
Yet, how are we to achieve this shining level of gnosis and balance with the
universe if we are not to have a planet to stand on. Are we to become learned tenants
of a revivified Earth, or are we to use this planet like a placenta to achieve
some sort of detached form of consciousness separate from our animal bodies?
These are questions to which no one has the answer. But, one thing is for
certain. If our western culture continues to travel in the direction which it
has been, we are going to completely use the ‘placenta’ and end up still-born.
I truly believe that mankind has to ability to transcend these global issues,
but it’s going to take radical cultural change. These changes are not possible
unless we develop a truly emotional and feminine connection to the death of our
own planet (this connection is violently suppressed by the powerful of western
society). First, we must all see these environmental and demographic trends
which inevitably end in apocalypse. Next, we must emotionally attach to this demise.
To emotionally connect, the use of psychedelic drugs are extremely useful, and
when the time of complete destruction is near, those in power may come calling
for those privy to this option. At the moment, these substances are very
illegal because of their boundary dissolving capabilities and their clear
antithesis to male dominator culture.
Before we are able to grasp
reality and pick up where we left off in our search for knowledge, we must find
balance with the Earth. This balance may be found through the embrace of the
mystic. We must also use our humanitarian knowledge to convince vast amounts of
people to stop having more than two children. Along these lines, we must also
try to foster emotional connections to the death of the Earth in people who
otherwise don’t care; this end CAN BE achieved through the use of psychedelic drugs
such as LSD, psilocybin and DMT, yet their legal status remains as such that
their use and distribution can land a truly good soul in prison for many years.
Finally, science must use its knowledge for purposes which save our planet
before using the knowledge to perpetuate the parasitic structures which we live
in. If this is not the goal of science, then the whole enterprise must be shut
down and r-tooled to have the purpose of saving human history. If mankind
cannot be saved, this pursuit of knowledge and the quest for finding the true
nature of reality will forever be lost. The whole march of evolution to this
point may be for nothing if we do not change immediately.
If our purpose is complete understanding, we're going to have to be satisfied with its attainment by those who come after us. That's a worthy aspiration, and it's a relief to admit that we (presently) don't know what we don't know and shouldn't feel inadequate for that. But I'd complement the quest for understanding with a co-purpose: enjoyment, satisfaction in the present with what is presently available.
ReplyDeleteI don't quite agree with Woody Allen that that the brain is our most overrated organ, but I do think we place too much pressure on ourselves to know. And to know THAT we know. Sometimes, just being is enough. Knowledge alone is not going to be our salvation. Or so my brain tells me.