What is Philosophy?
At the beginning of the semester, we introduced ourselves by
posting short biographies and our thoughts on taking a philosophy class. In these three final posts, I am going to
revisit some of the things I said in that introductory post, both to expound
upon them and to alter or qualify them, and to examine the purpose of
philosophy. Merriam Webster gives three definitions for philosophy: 1) the study of
ideas about knowledge, truth, the nature and meaning of life, etc; 2) a
particular set of ideas about knowledge, truth, the nature and meaning of life,
etc; 3) a set of ideas about how to do something or how to live.
The first definition refers
to an extremely personal interpretation of philosophy. I—and I would assume many others—daily reevaluate
my identity, my situation, and the situation of the world I live in. In such contemplations I fall into familiar
paths of circular questions, ones without definite answers, like “What is true?”,
“What is real?”, and “What does it all mean?”.
My subjective answers to these questions change often, and every time I
revisit them, they bring back the nagging paradox that I've found is central to
philosophy—the sense that I cannot live without knowing the answers to these
questions, but the fear that meaning is found in the journey to discovery, not
in the answers themselves.
The questions are important
in their own way. Even though they are
questions of value, and I rarely answer them the same way from year to year,
the fact that I come back to them and change my mind means that my current
opinion has value. I came to the
conclusion somehow, and I can present my reasoning or feelings to others,
enriching their philosophies or welcoming their thoughts to enrich mine. With few exceptions, it is when we settle on
a definite, permanent answer to a philosophical question that we invalidate our
philosophies. I’m writing in abstracts,
so to better explain my point I’ll give the example that inspired me to ponder
it:
My grandfather, now in his
eighties, has been in town the past several days. He’s always been stubborn, but in recent
months I've noticed he even wants to argue and shoot down my thoughts when I’m
trying to say I agree with him. I can’t
count on both hands the number of times in the last week that I've heard, “Now,
Sarah, listen—I’m older and wiser than you, so let me tell you something: [presents
sound or unsubstantiated point; it doesn't matter which because he’s already
decided he’s right]”. I don’t mean to
pick on my grandfather. I love him to
death and I appreciate the time I got to spend with him, but he reminds me why
I've become so wary of “philosophy”. In
practice, it often means none of the three definitions given by Merriam
Webster and is instead an umbrella term encompassing debate intended to keep
minds open as well and argument meant to defend closed minds.
In short, philosophy is the
continual pursuit of understanding, necessitating study of others’ ideas and
introspection. It is meant to help
people grow into better versions of themselves and to allow ideas to flow in a
changing world. As soon as discussions
turn to arguments or self-reflection ceases, philosophy is abandoned. As soon as age, position, or experience of
the opinion-holder are given as reasons to accept an opinion, that opinion is
no longer part of a philosophy.
The interactions you had with your grandfather is a problem I have a lot with my family, too. They kind of just use my age as a way to say I'm wrong, and invalidate my opinion.
ReplyDeleteAlso I think philosophy is more about the journey of trying to find the answer to whatever your big life questions. And of course, about friends you make along the way.
The best philosophy, IMHO, is a balance of skepticism and "essayed" belief (as Montaigne understood "essay": an attempt), without dogmatic insistence. Academia reinforces the worst human tendencies towards dogmatism, unfortunately. And sometimes so does aging. I'm planning to be the kinda geezer who don't know nuthin.
ReplyDeleteThis world is so confusing. I think its a natural point of regression for us to believe we're right 100% of the time (or right even 1% of the time :/ ). Its way more comfortable to live in a world that makes perfect sense. I think that's why a lot of us semi-bright folks tend to agonize over seeking out the true nature of reality, when (as Dr. Oliver pointed out above) it just increases our dogmatism and shades the big ugly possibility that we're all wrong.
ReplyDelete