Is Free Will an
illusion?
In this video, Benjamin Libet does an experiment to measure
brain activity using an EEG machine, and when asked to perfume a simple hand
gesture, Libet measured the brain activity to see when exactly they made a
conscious decision to move their hands. Libet recorded that the test subjects
had brain activity that initiated the movement hundreds of milliseconds before
the decision to move their hand was. From this experiment, Libet found that it
was not the conscious mind that caused the movement, it was the brain activity
bringing about movement caused the subject to move his/her hand, which leads
people to believe that free will is an illusion. They believe that our conscious
mind is more like reports of what is already happening than the causes of our
actions. Libet didn’t go with this, he believed that although we don’t have
free will, there is still time for something called “free won’t”. Libet defined
“free won’t” as it being a cautious veto of an action that is started in the
brain. This idea is very skeptical because there was doubt because of the
difficulty in finding the exact moment there was a subjective decision to move.
I don’t really agree with what Libet’s experiment found because I think that
you can’t change this idea of what free will is. God gave us free will, and the
ability to do whatever we want to do in life, but we must understand that there
are consequences that come with some actions. Free will gives us the power to choose
our life, and live it the way we want to. I believe that there is this idea of
free will because I believe that God wants us to live our life and make our own
choices, but he has a plan for each and every person, it’s just our decisions
help pave the way, and you might have your setbacks and feel like life is hard,
but you always end up getting back up, and life becomes good again and you just
have to keep moving forward on road you’re on. To watch the video, click the link below.
Sorry, I couldn't get past "perfume a simple hand gesture..."
ReplyDeleteJust kidding. "God gave us free will" hugely begs the philosophical question at issue. But grant that it might be so: how can a will that has been granted with the sufferance of an omniscient being (who already knows exactly how you'll use/abuse it) be genuinely "free"? OR, alternately, how can a will that's been conditioned by antecedent laws of nature be free?