Kyle
Shortman
11/16/14
Philosophy
1030
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Jean-Jacques
Rousseau was one of the foremost philosophers of his time in the eighteenth
century. Many of his revolutionary concepts still linger in modern society, which
is a true testament to Rousseau’s brilliance and wisdom. Rousseau lived in a
time where monarchies were prevalent in Europe, many of his ideas contradicted
these political concepts, and for this reason, Rousseau got in trouble on
multiple occasions for his innovative political ideas. Perhaps some of the most
impactful and significant ideas that Rousseau caused to become more pervasive
throughout Europe were concepts concerning mankind’s inherent natural goodness,
freedom, equality, and brotherhood in light of the time’s overpowering upper
class people and monarchies. These ideas were also extremely pivotal in
providing inspiration for future events such as the French revolution and the
enlightenment. Rousseau’s ideas of freedom and inherent goodness were very
appealing to the majority of Europeans who were in poverty in often unfairly
structured political and social landscapes in Europe during Rousseau’s time. In
addition to these concepts, Rousseau also developed something known as the general
will. The general will is simply whatever is best for the whole community or
state, thereby maximizing happiness, satisfaction, and overall quality of life
for the highest number of people possible. Since many of Rousseau’s
philosophical ideas appealed to the unheard masses in a time of uneven power
and hegemony, he quickly became an extremely well known and revered philosopher
that would make a lasting impact on political and societal structures.
Rousseau
began his life in Geneva in 1712 where he was born to clockmaker Isaac Rousseau
and Suzanne Bernard. After holding multiple occupations such as apprentice
engraver, teacher, and secretary, Rousseau decided to move to Paris in 1742.
Rousseau’s intentions upon moving to Paris were not concerning philosophy,
instead what Rousseau wanted to do was to become a composer. After achieving inadequate
success in composing, Rousseau began to turn his attention to philosophy. In
1750, Rousseau completed his first philosophical piece of literature entitled A Discourse on the Moral of the Arts and Sciences, which earned him an esteemed prize from
the Academy of Dijon. Perhaps one of the most substantial ideas that Rousseau
exhorted in this first work of his was that civilization must be visualized as
a history of moral and societal atrophy as opposed to progress. This idea
coincides with Rousseau’s idea’s concerning man’s inherent goodness and how
society and civilization is what corrupts this goodness. Rousseau’s next
notable philosophical works appeared in 1754 with his book Discourse on the Origin of Inequality Among Men and The Social Contract in 1762. The Social Contract is seen in modern
times as Rousseau’s most groundbreaking, and momentous philosophical work. It
is within The Social Contract that
Rousseau truly enforces his belief that man is innately good in a state of
nature and it is society and politics that corrupts mankind. Rousseau also
argues in the text that all people should be free, including women; an idea
that was extremely revolutionary and radical at the time. In addition, another
idea that Rousseau really reinforces in The
Social Contract is the concept of the general will. It is extremely
important to recognize that in Rousseau’s time, the majority of people in
Europe were under severe oppression from a wealthier, more powerful, and
incredibly small group of people. For this reason, Rousseau’s idea of the
general will in which all societal decisions that are made are to be made at
the interests of the most people possible was enormously appealing to these
great masses of oppressed people. Moving past the significance of The Social Contract and the ideas it
conveyed, Rousseau published yet another work called Emile or On Education. In this work, Rousseau stated “ Everything
is good as it leaves the hands of the author of things, everything degenerates
in the hands of man.”1 Here, Rousseau is once
again enforcing his key idea the belief that civilization is the reason for the
corrupt nature of man. Both The Social
Contract and Emile or On Education although
they mustered high support from the oppressed and impoverished masses, were
highly disliked by people in positions of power, and for this reason,
book-burnings of these texts transpired on multiple occasions. People that held
positions of power in Rousseau’s time were afraid that Rousseau’s philosophies
would empower the lower class to rise up and potentially threaten the existing
power structure in Europe. Sadly, Rousseau died in 1778 and for this reason he
was never able to see his ideas put into action during the French revolution that
was just starting to gain momentum at this time. Rousseau’s philosophical ideas
undoubtedly had a profound and empowering impact on the oppressed masses of a
European continent that had an exceedingly unfair power structure.
The many experiences that Rousseau had
through his life clearly played a huge role in determining the meaning of his
philosophical works and in the conception of his philosophical beliefs.
However, none of these works was more important and none of his beliefs were
more clearly and explicitly expressed than those in
The Social Contract specifically pertaining to the idea of
the general will. The Social Contract directly
challenged the existing power structure of Europe during Rousseau’s time, making
it a highly revolutionary piece of literature. The pervasive monarchies across
Europe put power in the hands of the few, the wealthy, and elite as opposed to
the people public whom Rousseau was trying to give power to. Ideas that
directly support and correlate with Rousseau’s concept of the general will can
be easily derived from the text of The
Social Contract. Rousseau essentially attempted to construct a civilization
in which equality amongst all people was the general force behind society. He
proposed a contract stating that everybody should forfeit the same rights and
give the same duties to all people and by doing so he believed that a just and
equal society could be forged. The Social
Contract was truly a landmark work in the development of Rousseau’s
philosophical ideas. One main reason this work caused such uproar and gained
such public appreciation was that it promoted the utilitarian notion of
maximizing happiness for the greatest amount of people. This kind of
utilitarian thought was not currently being implemented in European society due
to the rampant monarchical governments and unfair distribution of wealth during
Rousseau’s time. Ultimately
however according to Nigel Warburton in his work A Little History of Philosophy, Rousseau wanted to “find a way for
people to live together that would allow everyone to be as free as they were
outside society while still obeying the laws of the state” (Warburton 107).
This is significant because Rousseau is also revealing to the public his ideas
about the inherent goodness of man in a state of nature. Rousseau believed that
in a state of nature without society, mankind was naturally good-hearted and it
was society that corrupted human beings. Rousseau’s main goal in writing the
social contract is to find the perfect mixture between a state of nature and a
civilized society to mitigate moral and societal corruption and maximize moral
and societal happiness and morality.
The
utilitarian ideas that Rousseau published in The Social Contract were extremely significant during his time, but
it is very important to analyze the impact that these ideas had on society.
Rousseau’s progressive ideas like the General Will and the inherent goodness of
mankind in a state of nature played integral roles in overthrowing unjust
governments not just in Europe as was exhibited in the French revolution but
also in a America during the revolutionary war. The founding fathers, although
rarely observed citing Rousseau, admired his beliefs like the general Will and
some scholars say Rousseau was just as important in providing beliefs for the
United states Constitution as English philosopher John Locke was. Rousseau left
an incredible legacy as his ideas caused worldwide change even after his death,
and his thoughts still provide impact on society today especially in terms of
politics. According to scholar Melissa Lane, Rousseau’s critique on the then
current societal structures of the western world was based on a contrast he
made “Between amour de soi, and amour-propre” (PB 118). Amour de soi means self
preservation and amour-propre is how one believes others see them. One of the
largest critiques on society that Rousseau brought attention to was that people
put way too much emphasis on this concept of amour-propre. People focus too
much on their image and social standing and for this reason, they do not put
valuable input as citizens of modern society. Also according to Lane, Rousseau
pointed out “we’re in a society of plenty and yet we are less happy than when
we wandered naked in the glades of some barbaric past” (PB 118). This is
further evidence of Rousseau’s claims that mankind is naturally good-hearted
and moral in a state of nature. As one of his most central concepts, it is
clear that Rousseau put much emphasis on this idea throughout his life’s work.
This was most likely because in Rousseau’s time, the great imbalance of power
in society caused much hardship to a large number of people. By observing how
society and its current structure was causing this pervasive hardship, Rousseau
was able to develop his concept that if the society he was observing were not
there, the lack of rules and structure would result in a global population that
was less belligerent, greedy, and unsatisfied with life. One last quote in
which Rousseau conveyed his two main philosophical concepts that appealed to
the majority of society can be read in The
Social Contract, Rousseau wrote, “ Man was born free, and everywhere he is
in chains” (LH 106) Perhaps one of the most famous lines from his most famous
work, here Rousseau is claiming that the corruption of society was interfering
with man’s ability to feel freedom and happiness in a state of nature. Society
in Rousseau’s time was ran primarily by wealthy and powerful individuals who
promoted greed and brought unhappiness to a huge group of less-fortunate
people. However, by Proposing new and thought-provoking ideas like the general
will, and mankind’s innate goodness when society is not present Rousseau was
able to incite new societal and political ideas that would influence later
events like the American Revolutionary war and the French Revolution.
In
conclusion, Rousseau was one of the most significant philosophers of the
eighteenth century. His political and social ideas were like nothing else any
philosopher or thinker before him could conjure. These ideas included the
general will which stated that anything that anybody does should be for the
greatest good of society as a whole, and the idea that mankind is inherently
good in a state of nature, an idea that philosopher Thomas Hobbes would
strongly disagree with. Beyond this, not only were Rousseau’s ideas brilliant
in themselves, but they also appealed to a huge portion of society that was
then being oppressed by the current unfair political and societal structures of
Europe and the western world. This caused Rousseau to be loved by the common
man and disliked by the powerful and wealthy individuals that ran society at
that time. Rousseau’s ideas that supported a more just society were so
prominent and significant that even after Rousseau’s death, they played
important roles in inspiring future events such as the French Revolution and
the American Revolutionary war. Lastly, it is important to recognize that
Rousseau played a large role in inspiring the foundations of democracy, by
suggesting that power become more equally distributed and not given only to
specific individuals as the monarchies of his time did. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
critiqued society in a way that brought great beneficial change to society by
suggesting that the society at his time was corrupting people’s ability to be
inherently happy and moral. By seeking to correct this problem through his
philosophical teachings, Rousseau made himself one of the most important
philosophers of the enlightenment.
Good discussion of JJR.
ReplyDeleteBut... the first two sentences are gratuitous. Of course he was a "foremost" ph'er in the 18th cen., that's why we're still reading him in the 21st. Same for the opening summary sentence. Such statements are mere filler. Leave 'em out.