For my final report, I have decided
to elaborate on the philosophy of the existence of God. Part of the reason that
I have decided to go down this path is because I feel as if it is not only an
important topic but also the source of philosophy itself. In my endeavor, I
have decided to not only use scripture to back my claims but also research done
by Wayne Grudem, a prominent evangelical theologian, seminary professor and
author, and also with the help from his book Systematic Theology. The points
that I will discuss are: Humanity’s inner sense of God, Believing the evidence
in scripture and nature, Traditional “proofs” for the existence of God and the
inerrancy of scripture, which are all points and sub points discussed in
Grudem’s Systematic Theology.
1. The
Inerrancy of scripture.
Using Grudem’s definition, “the inerrancy of Scripture means
that Scripture in the original manuscripts does not affirm anything that is
contrary to fact.”(p.91) The reason that I start off with this topic is to both
affirm those who may not believe and reaffirm those who do that the references
that I make to scripture are in fact reliable sources to help explain the
existence of God. To start off, Grudem explains, “The bible can be inerrant and
still speak in ordinary language of everyday speech.”(p.91) This claim is
absolutely true in historical and scientific statements of events or facts.
Referring to the book of Numbers where it states that 8,000 men had died in
battle, “without thereby implying that he has counted everyone and that there
are not 7,999 or 8,001 dead soldiers. If roughly 8,000 died, it would of course
be false to say that 16,000 died, but it would not be false in most contexts
for a reporter to say that 8,000 men died when in fact 7,823 or 8,242 had died:
the limits on truthfulness would depend on the degree of precision implied the
speaker and expected by his original hearers.”(p.91) This statement refutes
claims about the precision of the accounts in scripture being inaccurate when,
“Inerrancy has to do with truthfulness, not with the degree of precision with
which events are reported.” (p.92)
Another
argument that is brought to attention on the grounds of the inerrancy of
scripture is that, “The Bible is only authoritative for “Faith and Practice”.”
Grudem explains that, “ This position would allow for the possibility of false
statements in Scripture, for example, in other areas such as in minor
historical details or scientific facts - these areas, it is said, do not
concern the purpose of the Bible, which is to instruct us in what we should
believe and how we are to live…. The response to this objection can be stated
as follows: the Bible repeatedly affirms that all of scripture is profitable
for us (2 Tim. 3:16) and all of it is “God breathed.” Thus it is completely
pure (Ps. 12:6), perfect (Ps. 119:96), and true (Prov. 30:5). The Bible itself
does not make any restriction on the kinds of subjects to which it speaks
truthfully.”(p.93) In conclusion, “..this first objection to inerrancy makes a
wrong use of a summary and thereby incorrectly attempts to impose artificial
limits on the kinds of things about which God can speak to us.” (p.95) This
particular topic can be explained further but I am bound by time, so there is
the inerrancy of scripture and its def. as well as sub points. My next post
will elaborate on the meat of my topic, The Existence of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.