Anderson, Michael T.
Honors Introduction to
Philosophy
12/10/2013
Two
Page Essay in Lieu of Third Exam
"Peter Singer represents the very
best tradition in philosophy. He is constantly challenging widely held
assumptions. His philosophy affects how he lives, and when he disagrees with
other people he is always prepared to challenge the opinions of those he finds
around him, to engage in public discussion."
This passage
from A Little History of Philosophy gives
praise to Peter Singer, whom the text labels as “…one of the best-known living
philosophers.” Singer is also an outspoken advocate of charity and aid to
impoverished countries, and a controversial figure due to his support of
assisted suicide. This support has made him unpopular in some circles, with a
few individuals going as far as to call him a Nazi. Singer first gained
popularity in the seventies with Animal
Liberation, in which he argues for the need to take animal suffering
seriously. He shares this view with Jeremy Bentham, who was the first to argue
for it in the nineteenth century.
Like Bentham, Singer is a consequentialist; they believe
“…that the best action is the one that produces the best result.” In order to
work out the best result, consequentialists state that “…we need to take into
account what is in the best interests of all concerned, including the interests
of animals.” Singer argues that animals have the same capacity to feel pain as
humans do. He as even coined the term
‘speciesist’, and the text likens being a speciesist to being racist or sexist.
Singer also advocates the vegetarian lifestyle, and has even printed a
vegetarian recipe in one of his books.
The text highlights Singer’s approach to moral questions
and its overall consistency, i.e. treating similar cases in a similar way. It
then points out the consistency in his stance on animal pain and his stance on
human pain. The text likens Singer to Socrates, because of his risky public
statements and standing behind his beliefs despite death threats. It highlights
the support he gives to his reasoned arguments with well-researched facts and
his sincerity as a philosopher. Finally, the text reminds us that philosophy
thrives on debate, and calls Singer a modern-day gadfly that will carry on the
spirit of Socrates in philosophy.
I agree with the passage for the most part. It seems that
Singer is a figure who’s not afraid to go against the grain and challenge
preconceived notions. From what I can tell, he applies his philosophy to his
life i.e. his vegetarian lifestyle. Singer seems like a person who is not
afraid to disagree with other people and doesn’t seem like a person who shies
away from debate. From what I have seen Singer has often taken place in public
discussion and is an advocate of it.
I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to suggest that
Singer carries on Socrates’s philosophical spirit. His method of challenging
widely held assumptions and asking questions for the purpose of sparking public
debate is very similar to what Socrates did in his day. Singer in this sense is
indeed a modern-day gadfly. He seems like a man who stands behind his beliefs,
and who is well-prepared to defend them.
I agree with the text that
philosophy thrives on debate; it would be a boring world if everyone agreed
with each other.
I think that if someone disagrees with Singer’s views or
anyone else’s views for that matter, it can’t hurt to at least try and see
where the opposite side is coming from.
Bibliography
Warburton,
Nigel. A Little History of Philosophy.
New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2012. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.