First, let’s begin with the definition of Hedonism
and understand where this philosophy originated from. We’ll return to the time
of Socrates then and look at a student of his, Aristippus. Originally born in
Cyrene, he moved to Athens as a young boy and received his first taste of
philosophy through the following of Socrates. Like many Greek philosophers of
that time, his main goal was to answer the question of “What is the end?” or
more as we understand it, “What is the purpose of life?” For Aristippus, it was
pleasure.
Unfortunately the majority of information about the philosopher
himself was written 500 years after his death and focusing on the general
consensus of those of opposing thought who saw him as perverse in his beliefs
and practices of them, but he did found the Cyrenaic school with his followers,
where his teachings of Hedonism lived on through his family and followers. Many
accounts of others’ stories of Aristippus portray him as a man who did not
refrain from instant gratification and pleasures, but reveled in them. Whether
these pleasures were of the nature of sexual, food, drink, or entertainment, it
did not matter. He would accept payment from those who stopped to listen to him
speak and this was looked down upon many fellow student of Socrates. For
Aristippus though, he saw himself as being free from the chains of society and
prejudices of giving into one’s most basic desires. This is quite different
from the beliefs of Epicurus, who came after Aristippus and also believed in
pleasure, but did not seek to overindulge in the way that his predecessor had.
And now for the introduction of the Cenobites.
You
may recognize these characters if you are familiar with the movie “Hellraiser”.
What is unfortunately becoming more and more common these days is the fact that
less people are aware of the books that inspire the movies, in this case, "The Hellbound Heart" by horror fiction writer Clive Barker. Personally, Barker is
one of my favorite authors because he has a writing style that is very unique
and detailed. He describes his characters in a way that allows you to
understand their moral and immoral motivations throughout the stories and challenges
you to ponder how your own actions might be in the same situations. He is
extremely descriptive in his setting of the plots and has a pragmatic touch to
the main characters in many of his books. The Hellbound Heart (which I will
refer to as HH from this point on) is a story that focuses on the pursuit of
pleasure and how many different ways that idea can be interpreted.
Although the title, movies, and comics that came
after the publication of HH imply that these Cenobite creatures are demons from
hell, Barker never actually points out that this is fact. The comics and movies
after the initial one were all made by people other than Barker as well, after
he sold the rights to the story. Barker’s Cenobites come from an alternate
reality or dimension through what is known as the “Schism”. This pathway can
only be opened by a Lemarchand’s Box. Philip Lemarchand was a French toymaker
in the 18th century who was commissioned by a wealthy aristocrat
obsessed with the belief of a realm of pleasure and he wanted Lemarchand to
build him a key to unlock such a doorway to such a place. The full story of the
puzzles created by Lermarchand and what happened to them differ whether reading
the comic series or watching the movies, but for the purposes of this post, I
just want to focus on the little background of it given in HH. The Lament
Configuration is the specific puzzle box found in the story that must be solved
in order to gain access to the alternate realm, which Barker implies is hidden
in the shadows just behind that of our own realm.
Once the doorway is opened,
the Cenobites come for the one who solved the puzzle. The Cenobites appear
human, albeit deformed and mutilated, because they were once human. They had
all sought out more pleasurable experiences than their present realities had to
offer and solved the puzzle to open the doorway. In HH, the Cenobites claim
they are members of the Order of the Gash. Barker also refers to them as
“hierophants” or people who bring followers into that which they deem holy. The
main character does as all those before him have and seeks out the key to the
realm because he feels that there is nothing left in the world that could
satisfy him and therefore the Cenobites must have the answers to pleasure he
seeks. That is the main point of the beginning of the story, that this
confrontation with the Cenobites was sought out and was actually more tedious
and time-consuming that simply calling upon them.
For the Cenobites, once they are called, they must
claim the one who summoned them. Their philosophy of hedonism is taken to the
extreme, where the solver of the puzzle is taken back to their realm and put
through situations of sensory overload that takes every possible sense to its
capacity. Their belief is that pain and pleasure are one in the same and
through this act of what we would deem torture, they have a better
understanding of what it is to feel. They have no ties to what is moral or
immoral and place the practice of pushing the limits of pleasure as the focus
of their existence. They do not view what they are doing as wrong or any kind
of punishment, because those that access their realm have sought it out and
have asked for such treatment, whether knowingly or not, they do not care. The
purpose of their mutilations on themselves and newcomers stems from their
belief that the flesh hinders the order of the mind by trying to distinguish
pleasure from pain in the sense of sensations. While in the realm, the person’s
body can be pushed beyond the laws of physics and human capacity we are aware
of in our own reality. For example, the mutilations depicted in the HH would
kill anyone here, but in their realm the person’s consciousness is sustained no
matter the condition of the body. If a person realizes through these
mutilations that the line between pleasure and pain is no longer apparent to
them, the Engineer, who is referred to as the leader of the Order of the Gash,
will deem them worthy to become a Cenobite and their mutilations will reflect
that of their own interpretation of pleasure.
I believe it is safe to say that for many, their initial reaction to the idea
of finding pleasure in mutilation would be one of shock and disbelief. Most people would be quick
to say that they can plainly distinguish the line between pain and pleasure and
the two are as different as black and white. But if we stop and think about it,
are they really that separated? Both feelings are interpreted in the same part
of the brain and it is through personal experiences that we learn to
distinguish between the two. What is painful for one person may not be for
another. For example, for many people piercings and tattooing are painful practices
that cause anxiety at the thought of going through it. If it’s painful, we should
avoid it, right? But the amount of ink seen on people today is testimony to the
fact that the pain, or expectation of, will not deter customers.
Another example could be that of sadomasochism
(S&M) which has been brought to light more in recent times through the
popularity of the book, “50 Shades of Grey”. There are many forms of pain
linked to pleasure in this lifestyle, and I’m sure we could gain from valuable
insight if I was to know of anyone actively participating in this, but they do
seem to keep it well hidden. After reading some of the prejudices against it, I can understand why.
So, my questions for you are these: are you sure of
your ideas of pleasure and pain? Are you certain of your limits and boundaries
of each? For the characters in the book, pleasure was synonymous with sexual
gratification, and for the Cenobites, pleasure was defined by sensations felt
by the skin. Is that all that pleasure is? Just sensations? Or is there more to
it? A hedonistic view on life would encourage you to pursue pleasures wherever
they could be found… but where would you begin to look?
I think that we have emotional reactions to pleasure and pain, the same way the we react physically. Based on our perceptions of pleasure and pain, we form opinions on what they mean and how it feels emotionally when they occur, so that we are reinforced by unique perceptions. We may agree on a fundamental level what defines pain and how it differs from pleasure, but we hold unique reactions to each.
ReplyDeleteI think that we have emotional reactions to pleasure and pain, the same way the we react physically. Based on our perceptions of pleasure and pain, we form opinions on what they mean and how it feels emotionally when they occur, so that we are reinforced by unique perceptions. We may agree on a fundamental level what defines pain and how it differs from pleasure, but we hold unique reactions to each.
ReplyDeleteI think that "pleasure" is indeed merely sensation. Pleasure in and of itself is a physiological response to certain environmental stimuli. The hedonist viewpoint is that "pleasure" is what brings happiness. Which as we know is something Aristotle would frown upon. Also my grandma, who was a straight-up Mormon. She was not very big on "pleasure", but did enjoy happiness where she could find it...
ReplyDeleteI like the brain chart, but I take issue with the idea that the experiential locus of these pleasures is the brain as such. A disembodied brain in a vat would not get nearly as much out of chocolate, sex, or a walk in the park (why isn't that on there?) as an embodied person.
ReplyDeletethank you ....... this really helped me .......
ReplyDeleteinspiring once ........ nice ........
visit also my website please ........
Cara Mengobati Sipilis
Obat Untuk Sakit Sipilis
Obat Untuk Penyakit Sipilis
Pengobatan Penyakit Sipilis
Obat Untuk Menyembuhkan Penyakit Sipilis
Hi there! Nice post! Please tell us when I will see a follow up!
ReplyDeleteBox Μελισσες