Up@dawn 2.0

Thursday, August 30, 2012


Section #14 Group#1 (Socrates)

       During the class discussion of August 30,2012, we,as Group #1, initiated the group discussion by becoming acquainted with one another, by going around our close knit circle introducing ourselves. Shortly afterwards, we all took a brief moment to think about who Socrates was to us and about the impact he had on the philosophical world. But then, we quickly came to realize that neither of us had taken a moment to share our individual views on what philosophy itself actually means to us. Not surprisingly, an assortment of opinions were shared one after the other, with the definition of philosophy ranging from the way an individual thinks all the way to the reason why people lead the different lives that they do. Although that point in our session was fairly intriguing to listen to, one of the most interesting topics brought up during the course of the discussion was about the people that we considered to be brilliant philosophers. One particular member of Group #1 caused us all to see philosophy in a non traditional light ,while using the general concept of philosophy that we as group developed,  as he professed to us how individuals unlike Socrates and Plato the like, but more like authors such as Mark Twain, could be brilliant philosophers. His reasoning being that Mark Twain frequently pondered about the "quirks" of life and humans, as well as their nature, all while criticizing his own life and way of thinking. In continuation of the discussion, we all then analyzed the similarities and differences in our views before revealing a few of our own personal philosophies, like minding one's own business, prior to closing out our session. Furthermore, our first group discussion went pleasingly well, and I'm sure there will be more to come!

8 comments:

  1. Journey Button-Hale11:52 PM CDT

    Great summary Landy!

    I really enjoyed meeting all of you and our group discussions. The question that we discussed "What is philosophy?" really has no answer. While it can be generalized, we all have our own views. I feel that philosophy is trying to really understand how we think and what we think about. Our group showed me how varied philosophy really is. Moving on to our next subject, Socrates, I would really like to know how all of you (group 1) agree and disagree with Socrates' philosophy. I think comparing his philosophy to ours and seeing how it applies to our lives would be an interesting discussion. See you all next week!

    Journey

    ReplyDelete
  2. Deonte Cason11:47 AM CDT

    After meeting my fellow group mates last Thursday, I have to say I'm excited to see what this semester brings us. Other than us meeting and telling funny stories with one another we came to the conclusion that ALL people are philisophical in many different ways. Many of us had some interesting philisophical views of life, while others, like I, struggled to grasp the concept of a strong personal philiosophy. I believe Socrates' philiosophy about life is somewhat true. It never hurts to overthink life because we as people have questioned it one time at least. His beliefs opened up the barriers to a world of critical thinking which everyone can benifit from. Hopefully on Tuesday we can all discuss this more deeply!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello classmates,
    I have completed the assigned reading, and I would like to share a couple of questions with you all for our next discussion.
    -How was Socrates put to death?
    -Why do you think Socrates' physical appearance greatly differed from how he appeared to certain individuals intellectually?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Paul Montgomery8:10 PM CDT

    Hola group uno!
    I have some questions for next class as well:
    Who did Socrates teach and which of his pupils prospered in their own careers as a philosopher?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Katie Brown8:53 PM CDT

    Hello everybody!

    I really enjoyed meeting and learning a few things about every one last week. I am already looking forward to this semester, I think we all have a lot of things in common! Anyways.. let's get to the question "What is philosophy?" I agree with Journey on this topic. I do not believe there is a direct answer to this question. When it comes to Socrates, I feel like he shouldn't have been killed for "corrupting the youth." I don't think he did anything wrong, he was just expressing his views as a philosopher. I am looking forward to this week though to see what everybody else thinks! See y'all soon!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Matthew D Terrill11:44 AM CDT

    Hello all,
    I enjoyed meeting everyone last week and look forward to more group meetings. In regards to the topic of what constitutes philosophy, I still do not have a very strong grasp on one specific meaning. I expect a well defined meaning to become more apparent as the class continues. After reading the assignment I have come up with the following two questions.
    1). What was Plato's most famous work?
    2) What is "truth by authority"?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Brandon Carter1:19 PM CDT

    Hello fellow group members,
    I really enjoyed meeting with everyone last week. We discussed what we each felt philosophy actually is, and i realized that I do not think that there is a specific definition of philosophy. I feel that everyone has there own perception of what philosophy actually is, therefore i believe that everyone is a philosopher in their own right. I am looking forward to meeting with you guys and discussing other subjects.
    1.What are Socretes and Platos differences?
    2.Why do you think they are so different?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Chase Akers3:15 PM CDT

    Hello Group One. Chase here, just now getting to my post. I apologize both for my lateness on obtaining the Kindle version of the books, and for my tardiness of my post! Anyhow, I'd like to get started.

    I absolutely loved the discussion we began today on "moral relativism" with Socrates' question. Socrates asked whether or not we find it "immoral" or "deceitful" to steal a knife from someone wishing to commit suicide. I was happy to find out that Rachel, a fellow group member, had read Lewis' "Mere Christianity", which deals with the idea of Moral Relativism. We began with an apt comparison of this to Batman's dilemma: does he kill the Joker, or let a hospital full of children explode? Our general discussion also revolved around the idea of cultural norm - for example the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We asked ourselves if it was "alright" for the U.S. in WWII to retaliate with such unrelenting force. I suppose my 2 questions I would like to pose would be these:

    1. Why was the government so quick to shun Socrates' ideals?

    2. In today's world, would we be more inclined to revere Socrates?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.